[okfn-help] [Open Knowledge Foundation Blog] Comment: "New Linking Open Data group on CKAN"

[Jonathan Gray]

Dear Tom,

I agree with you that showing a '?' for packages where nothing has
been selected in the licensing field would be better than showing a
'X'.

I've carbon copied this to our 'okfn-help' list. David, Rufus: would
this be difficult to implement? Presumably there is a '?' famfamfam
icon we could use?

Best wishes,

Jonathan

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Tom Morris <wordpress at blog.okfn.org> wrote:
> New comment on your post #1104 "New Linking Open Data group on CKAN"
> Author : Tom Morris (IP: 65.215.113.195 , 65.215.113.195)
> E-mail : tfmorris at gmail.com
> URL    : http://tfmorris.blogspot.com
> Whois  : http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=65.215.113.195
> Comment:
> <p>The licensing data display is misleading.  Instead of showing a red X for missing information, wouldn't it be more appropriate to show a question mark (?) or some other symbol to let them know what's going on?</p>
>
> <p>Currently you have to dig through several screens to figure out that a bunch of these entries just got created without any license information at all.  That's not the same thing as "not open."</p>
>
>
> You can see all comments on this post here:
> http://blog.okfn.org/2009/11/05/new-linking-open-data-group-on-ckan/#comments
>
> Delete it: http://blog.okfn.org/wp-admin/comment.php?action=cdc&c=252501
> Spam it: http://blog.okfn.org/wp-admin/comment.php?action=cdc&dt=spam&c=252501
>
>



-- 
Jonathan Gray

Community Coordinator
The Open Knowledge Foundation
http://www.okfn.org