[okfn-labs] okfn-labs Digest, Vol 52, Issue 14

ADEYEMO AYODELE OBA christad92 at gmail.com
Sun May 17 14:09:47 UTC 2015


Hello,

This thread as much as it seems compelling in terms if its impact to save
the 75% of the world (approximately 4 billion people across communities),
we have a good drive and it is very achievable.

>From prior experiences working with GIS as a daily tool, there are
different geolocating / address systems which have been implemented and
have guided the development patterns in most advanced communities. How do
we make others comply to this?

Do we institute a new addressing system for the open culture?
Forcefully impose those address schemes on underdeveloped worlds?

Even when we institute a new address system how do we control
interoperability concerns?

We need to understand the possible things.

Finally, all that matter in everything is this Location, Location and
Location. We need to care about it.

Thanks trio,

Ayodele Oba ADEYEMO
Geogeek, GIS and Mapping Expert, Data Analyst
Open Data Advocate
Twitter: @iyoaye
Facebook : christad92
+2348163174143
 Support project NODA. You can work with us as a volunteer by registering
at www.bit.ly/NodaVolunteer or follow us on Twitter @opendata_ng
On May 17, 2015 1:00 PM, <okfn-labs-request at lists.okfn.org> wrote:

> Send okfn-labs mailing list submissions to
>         okfn-labs at lists.okfn.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-labs
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         okfn-labs-request at lists.okfn.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         okfn-labs-owner at lists.okfn.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of okfn-labs digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: opening up what3words (trio)
>    2. Re: opening up what3words (willi uebelherr)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 22:57:20 +0000
> From: trio <trio at esperanto.org>
> To: okfn-labs <okfn-labs at lists.okfn.org>
> Subject: Re: [okfn-labs] opening up what3words
> Message-ID:
>         <CAJ0pmK_EBHnSeVvWoEjwkRfMKcd437SfXu_vpyzN6HNPwUG_=
> Q at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 7:02 PM, willi uebelherr
> <willi.uebelherr at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Am 15-May-15 um 07:55 schrieb stef:
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:26:27PM +0200, Ingmar Schlecht wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I have to say I find the basic idea of what3words rather pointless. Why
> >>> would you want an address scheme from which you can't draw any
> conclusion
> >>> at
> >>> all regarding its location by just looking at it.
>
>    According to http://what3words.com/about/ :
> -=-=-
> Why is it important?
>
> Around 75% of the world (135 countries) suffers from inconsistent,
> complicated or inadequate addressing systems.
>
> This means that around 4 billion people are invisible; unable to
> report crime; unable to get deliveries or receive aid; and unable to
> exercise many of their rights as citizens because they simply have no
> way to communicate where they live.
>
> For example, it means that in remote locations water facilities can?t
> be found, monitored and fixed; and schools, refugee camps and informal
> settlements remain unaddressed.
>
> Even in countries with advanced address systems, people get lost,
> packages aren?t delivered, and businesses and tourist attractions
> don?t get found.
>
> Poor addressing might seem no more than annoying in some countries,
> but around the world it hampers the growth and development of nations,
> ultimately costing lives.
>
> We want to give everyone in the world the ability to talk about a
> precise location as easily as possible.
>
> Everyone and everywhere now has an address.
> -=-=-
>
>    Perhaps i've just been attracted to their propaganda that makes it
> sound like they could "save lives"? I first thought it made sense, but
> your arguments against it are persuading me to the opposite
> conclusion.
>
>    If one lives in a place where they don't have a serious address,
> are they going to have enough infrastructure to say "please send my
> solar panel to up.creek.paddle" instead of "... to the cabin up the
> hill from the place where the river turns northward, after the big
> waterfall"? Do i need a precise location under those circumstances?
> Will an ambulance come to ran.off.road more easily than GPS
> coordinates where someone found a broken down automobile?
>
>    I think i first was tempted by the project because it seems so
> easily copied by an Open system. But, if it's not worth doing... thank
> you for saving us the trouble of building it. :)
>
> --
> universero trio
> Esperanto, The International Language! What's that? See
> http://Esperanto.Org
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 20:22:25 -0300
> From: willi uebelherr <willi.uebelherr at gmail.com>
> To: okfn-labs <okfn-labs at lists.okfn.org>
> Subject: Re: [okfn-labs] opening up what3words
> Message-ID: <5557D131.4010001 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
>
> Dear Trio,
>
> i agree absolutly with your intention and how you describe the reality.
> But many of that, what you explain, we can't change it with the address
> maping in a computer.
>
> The first is, that all people in the world have a free and unlimited
> access to the technical systems for communication. Then, and only then,
> they can communicate with us. And we with them. This is the immaterial
> transport system. It is easier to build.
>
> The material transport system is more complicated. But, of course, also
> very important.
>
> All people have an address. Never we live in a virtual environment. The
> textual descripton helps us, to find the coordinate in the geodetic
> system. As the WC84 (GPS, OpenStreetmap, Gmap) or similar.
>
> I think, in the textual description we should use and see the
> geographical relations. This helps us for an easier orientation.
>
> many greetings, willi
> Cordoba, Argentina
>
>
> Am 16-May-15 um 19:57 schrieb trio:
> > ...
> > Why is it important?
> >
> > Around 75% of the world (135 countries) suffers from inconsistent,
> > complicated or inadequate addressing systems.
> >
> > This means that around 4 billion people are invisible; unable to
> > report crime; unable to get deliveries or receive aid; and unable to
> > exercise many of their rights as citizens because they simply have no
> > way to communicate where they live.
> >
> > For example, it means that in remote locations water facilities can?t
> > be found, monitored and fixed; and schools, refugee camps and informal
> > settlements remain unaddressed.
> >
> > Even in countries with advanced address systems, people get lost,
> > packages aren?t delivered, and businesses and tourist attractions
> > don?t get found.
> >
> > Poor addressing might seem no more than annoying in some countries,
> > but around the world it hampers the growth and development of nations,
> > ultimately costing lives.
> >
> > We want to give everyone in the world the ability to talk about a
> > precise location as easily as possible.
> >
> > Everyone and everywhere now has an address.
> > -=-=-
> >
> >     Perhaps i've just been attracted to their propaganda that makes it
> > sound like they could "save lives"? I first thought it made sense, but
> > your arguments against it are persuading me to the opposite
> > conclusion.
> >
> >     If one lives in a place where they don't have a serious address,
> > are they going to have enough infrastructure to say "please send my
> > solar panel to up.creek.paddle" instead of "... to the cabin up the
> > hill from the place where the river turns northward, after the big
> > waterfall"? Do i need a precise location under those circumstances?
> > Will an ambulance come to ran.off.road more easily than GPS
> > coordinates where someone found a broken down automobile?
> >
> >     I think i first was tempted by the project because it seems so
> > easily copied by an Open system. But, if it's not worth doing... thank
> > you for saving us the trouble of building it. :)
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-labs mailing list
> okfn-labs at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-labs
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-labs
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of okfn-labs Digest, Vol 52, Issue 14
> *****************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-labs/attachments/20150517/696b68a4/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the okfn-labs mailing list