[Open-access] Open Science Anthology published
Pierre-Carl Langlais
pierrecarl.langlais at gmail.com
Sun Jan 19 12:09:34 UTC 2014
Sorry for hacking the topic, but I've always wondered why CC-BY became
the standard of Open Access and not CC-BY-SA. This license is not viral:
it allows the republication under any kind of intellectual protection
(including copyright) and, therefore, the re-establishment of
enclosures. That's not really the kind of disposition that would ensure
an healthy open access ecosystem, especially considering the current
open washing frenzy. CC-BY is a real blessing for scientific social
network, that are prone to enclose a once-free content in order to drain
personal data. Even the public domain greets more protection, as
copyfraud tends to be more and more discredited.
I might sound heterodox, but, by this concern, I even prefer CC-NC to
CC-BY… At least, the license includes some kind of virality, even if NC
remains a much poorer protection than SA.
PCL
Le 19/01/14 12:51, Pal Lykkja a écrit :
> What is the problem with CC-NC if it will be possible to reuse like
> TDM throught copyright exceptions that EU are working for?
>
> Pål Lykkja
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk
> <mailto:pm286 at cam.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
> Sounds useful.
>
> One comment. CC-NC is not Open Access under BOAI- and OKD-
> definitions. I'd urge you to make the book CC-BY. If there are
> reasons that you can't do this, please drop the term "Open Access"
> and call it "free-of-charge". CC-NC forbids many forms of
> redistribution and re-use
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Ulrich Herb
> <u.herb at scinoptica.com <mailto:u.herb at scinoptica.com>> wrote:
>
> Dear lists,
>
> perhaps this might be of interest: Yesterday an anthology on
> Open Science was published: "Opening Science - The Evolving
> Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration
> and Scholarly Publishing". It has been edited by Sönke
> Bartling from the German Cancer Research Center in Heidelberg
> and Sascha Friesike, researcher at the Alexander von Humboldt
> Institute in Berlin. The anthology knows four manifestations:
> it is available as a printed book, as an Open Access e-Book
> or PDF collection under a CC BY-NC license, and as an editable
> living document via Github. for further information please visit:
> http://www.openingscience.org/get-the-book/
>
> Best regards
>
> Ulrich Herb
>
> --
> scinoptica science consulting and publishing consulting
> POB 10 13 13
> D-66013 Saarbrücken
> Germany
> http://www.scinoptica.com/pages/en/start.php
> +49-(0)157 30306851 <tel:%2B49-%280%29157%2030306851>
> http://twitter.com/#!/scinoptica
> <http://twitter.com/#%21/scinoptica>
>
> ---
> Diese E-Mail ist frei von Viren und Malware, denn der avast!
> Antivirus Schutz ist aktiv.
> http://www.avast.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-access mailing list
> open-access at lists.okfn.org <mailto:open-access at lists.okfn.org>
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-access
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-access
>
>
>
>
> --
> Peter Murray-Rust
> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> University of Cambridge
> CB2 1EW, UK
> +44-1223-763069 <tel:%2B44-1223-763069>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-access mailing list
> open-access at lists.okfn.org <mailto:open-access at lists.okfn.org>
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-access
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-access
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-access mailing list
> open-access at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-access
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-access
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-access/attachments/20140119/15fb5377/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the open-access
mailing list