[open-archaeology] [Antiquist] Re: Heritage Method Store Proposal
Federico Morando
federico.morando at gmail.com
Thu Sep 23 14:34:35 UTC 2010
Dear David and Cameron, dear all,
thanks for your kind feedback and apologies for my original largely
off-topic message: I admit that the link with the topic post was at most
weak... my point, in fact, was that some simple technologies and
methodologies could favor the kind of interaction with amateurs and
enthusiasts that I was describing. Hence, I was pointing out that
individuating these technologies could have been a nice by-product of
the method store.
I agree with your suggestion: let's keep these things separate. I will
be happy to go on discussing these issues on the [open-archaeology]
list, if you agree, and I would suggest labeling this topic as
"crowd-sourcing archaeological data". [I can think about various,
frequently very different, kinds of "crowd-sourcing", but I don't want
to discuss them under the "Heritage Method Store Proposal": I've already
done enough off-topic discussion! ;-)]
Stefano, do you think that this discussion is worth the creation of a
pad like the following:
http://archeo.okfnpad.org/crowdsource-archaeo-data
? (I hope that your answer is "Yes", because I know that you're very
sensitive to issues related to user generated content and the like.)
I think that we could already start populating this pad with interesting
points, since I definitely agree with Cameron about the reasons because
of which a pilot related to ancient coins could be appropriate (and I
would be happy to expand these points with specific examples).
Best,
Federico
On 09/23/2010 08:47 AM, Cameron Neylon wrote:
> Dear All
>
> Just to give some context, my connection with this is that I'm helping
> out the DART project with advice on data management, web
> infrastructure and how best to run an "open project". My background is
> really in structural biology so I'm seeing this from an outsiders
> perspective on the technical side. One of my other interests is how to
> truly engage the wider community in research efforts (see the most
> recent slideshow at http://slideshare.net/cameronneylon for a recent
> rant on the subject). So this discussion is very close to my heart.
>
> I find the idea of a collective coin sharing side quite compelling
> from a number of perspectives. It does seem like a very good case
> where there is a community and there is a motivation to share
> information. It could also provide a good test bed for wider sharing
> of finds (my impression is that there is already a community that
> shares information here quite a lot) and also photos of archaeological
> significance (thinking crop for example). There is also a possible
> engagement activity here with taking high quality photographic
> equipment to meets to help people record their finds according to best
> practice I would guess.
>
> It would be very interesting to share for instance images of coins,
> the location of finds, and the provenance trail. I am guessing that
> there is significant swapping between collections and helping people
> to track that via the passing on of records could be very interesting.
> I would also imagine that people are a bit uncomfortable with sharing
> the location of finds (and there are probably both good and bad
> reasons for that) but it would be a very interesting thing to probe.
> If it encouraged a bit more recording of the discovery and recovery
> process that could presumably hardly be a bad thing. It would be
> worthwhile in this regard to talk to the Galaxy Zoo people as they
> have some infrastructure to support this kind of thing.
>
> I agree this is quite separate to a method store and its good to keep
> separate things separate. I can see how connections would form in the
> future but it would likely be better to let them evolve on their own
> in the first instance. I would encourage you to think about how to
> take these ideas forward tho.
>
> Hope this is helpful.
>
> Cheers
>
> Cameron
>
>
> On 22/09/2010 19:23, "david stott" <davstott at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Federico:
> I entirely agree- this has been something I've been thinking about
> quite a lot recently and am really keen to get started on soon. It
> is, however something quite different from the method store i think.
>
> The idea that we can enrich our records with information from
> amatuer archaeologists and other interested people is one that a
> lot of archaeologists I've dicsussed it with seem quite sceptical
> about- but I think the idea that we can crowd-source
> archaeological data has a lot of advantages and could be a very
> powerful resource- especially in areas where there are not the
> curatorial resources to manage cultural heritage effectively. It
> is something that came up at the AARG conference recently and that
> Anthony Beck, Oscar Aldred, I and others discussed fairly
> extensively over the weekend. I'm busy tonight but would be
> delighted to discuss how´we can do more in future!
>
> Best,
>
> David
>
>
> On 22 September 2010 16:50, Federico Morando
> <federico.morando at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to add a perspective about this interesting
> topic: as a by-product of this (admittedly quite ambitious)
> project, some simple methodologies (and possibly some related
> how-to) could be recommended to various hobbyist and amateurs
> (e.g. coin collectors) wanting to share information online.
>
> In fact, this suggestion comes from the fact that I'm
> interested in these topics from two points of view: as a
> researcher working on public sector information (and content)
> related issues from a multidisciplinary point of view (law,
> technology & economics), taking into account the possibilities
> of interactions between information held by - say - public
> universities and user generated content; as a ancient coin
> collector (with a specific interest in relationships between
> amateurs and professionals and in legal schemes trying to
> minimize abuses and looting, maximizing the circulation of
> information: e.g. the portable antiquities scheme in UK and
> relates norms).
>
> For instance, coin collectors frequently share online pictures
> and other infos about their collections, but they tend to do
> so ignoring (at least in part) best practices and/or standards
> which could help in making a scientific use of these pieces of
> information (nonetheless, I think that today websites such as
> http://wildwinds.com/ may help archaeologists without a strong
> numismatic background in identifying ancient coins). The kind
> of how-to which could help coin collectors making their
> information more usable for researchers includes, for
> instance, best practices to add semantic information to online
> collections of pictures of ancient coins (RDF related
> technologies, such as RDFa, ontologies and dictionaries, etc.).
>
> Similarly, exposing some information about their findings,
> also archaeologist could sometimes benefit from interactions
> with amateurs: for instance, I have some friends working as
> archaeologist and they had to admit more than once that I know
> more than them (or their colleagues on a given excavation)
> about certain kinds of coins (e.g. late Roman bronzes or
> Celtic coins of northern Italy). That happens simply because
> I'm specialized on a very narrow subset of potentially
> archaeologically relevant knowledge, but this already allowed
> me to casually help one of them in identifying a worn coin
> simply looking at a picture, while my friend did not have many
> clues to start its identification (in fact, to me that flat
> bronze disk was clearly a Republican Roman as, but from the
> stratigraphic information one would have been pushed to think
> about medieval coins...).
> [There is interesting research going on in various fields
> about crowd-sourcing and I think that - up to a certain points
> - something could be done also in archaeology... it has been
> done for complex mathematical problems, but NASA also did that
> with a certain success for identifying craters on Mars, for
> instance...]
>
> So, to make a long story short, I think it could be nice to
> think about methodologies (and software tools) creating a
> bridge between professional archaeologist and various kind of
> amateurs. More specifically, I would suggest to do some pilot
> work on ancient coins, simply because there are big
> communities of coin collectors online, because researchers in
> this field always used the work of collectors quite
> intensively (many well known ancient coins catalogues have
> been written by collectors in the past), but also because I
> would happily volunteer as collector participating in such a
> pilot and/or proposing this idea to other collectors.
>
> Best,
>
> Federico
>
>
>
> On 09/21/2010 06:57 PM, Stefano Costa wrote:
>
> Il giorno mar, 21/09/2010 alle 10.09 +0100, Leif Isaksen
> ha scritto:
>
> - As a separate issue, a few of us have been toying
> with the idea of
> setting up a Stack Exchange site for Technology in the
> Humanities
> (http://area51.stackexchange.com/). This would have to
> be quite a
> large affair in order to work (i.e. we'd need to rope
> in antiquisters,
> digital classicists, HASTACers, and so on in order to
> reach a
> functioning scale) but it's Q&A format would nicely
> complement both
> the mailing lists (which are good for announcements
> and making
> personal contacts) on the one hand and more
> substantial knowledge
> articles such as the proposed methods wiki on the
> other. In any case,
> if anyone is interested in the initial phase of
> getting it off the
> ground please get in touch offlist.
>
> I will reply in more detail later, but for the moment
> being I'd like to
> point out that a very similar web platform is already
> available on OKFN
> infrastructure, e.g. see http://ask.okfn.org/en/
>
> The major difference (and advantage, IMHO) would be in
> self-hosting and
> capability to license everything under CC-BY.
>
> I've started drafting the current proposal at
> http://archeo.okfnpad.org/methodology-store - please feel
> free to
> contribute.
>
> Ciao,
> steko
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 22 September 2010 16:50, Federico Morando
> <federico.morando at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to add a perspective about this interesting
> topic: as a by-product of this (admittedly quite ambitious)
> project, some simple methodologies (and possibly some related
> how-to) could be recommended to various hobbyist and amateurs
> (e.g. coin collectors) wanting to share information online.
>
> In fact, this suggestion comes from the fact that I'm
> interested in these topics from two points of view: as a
> researcher working on public sector information (and content)
> related issues from a multidisciplinary point of view (law,
> technology & economics), taking into account the possibilities
> of interactions between information held by - say - public
> universities and user generated content; as a ancient coin
> collector (with a specific interest in relationships between
> amateurs and professionals and in legal schemes trying to
> minimize abuses and looting, maximizing the circulation of
> information: e.g. the portable antiquities scheme in UK and
> relates norms).
>
> For instance, coin collectors frequently share online pictures
> and other infos about their collections, but they tend to do
> so ignoring (at least in part) best practices and/or standards
> which could help in making a scientific use of these pieces of
> information (nonetheless, I think that today websites such as
> http://wildwinds.com/ may help archaeologists without a strong
> numismatic background in identifying ancient coins). The kind
> of how-to which could help coin collectors making their
> information more usable for researchers includes, for
> instance, best practices to add semantic information to online
> collections of pictures of ancient coins (RDF related
> technologies, such as RDFa, ontologies and dictionaries, etc.).
>
> Similarly, exposing some information about their findings,
> also archaeologist could sometimes benefit from interactions
> with amateurs: for instance, I have some friends working as
> archaeologist and they had to admit more than once that I know
> more than them (or their colleagues on a given excavation)
> about certain kinds of coins (e.g. late Roman bronzes or
> Celtic coins of northern Italy). That happens simply because
> I'm specialized on a very narrow subset of potentially
> archaeologically relevant knowledge, but this already allowed
> me to casually help one of them in identifying a worn coin
> simply looking at a picture, while my friend did not have many
> clues to start its identification (in fact, to me that flat
> bronze disk was clearly a Republican Roman as, but from the
> stratigraphic information one would have been pushed to think
> about medieval coins...).
> [There is interesting research going on in various fields
> about crowd-sourcing and I think that - up to a certain points
> - something could be done also in archaeology... it has been
> done for complex mathematical problems, but NASA also did that
> with a certain success for identifying craters on Mars, for
> instance...]
>
> So, to make a long story short, I think it could be nice to
> think about methodologies (and software tools) creating a
> bridge between professional archaeologist and various kind of
> amateurs. More specifically, I would suggest to do some pilot
> work on ancient coins, simply because there are big
> communities of coin collectors online, because researchers in
> this field always used the work of collectors quite
> intensively (many well known ancient coins catalogues have
> been written by collectors in the past), but also because I
> would happily volunteer as collector participating in such a
> pilot and/or proposing this idea to other collectors.
>
> Best,
>
> Federico
>
>
>
> On 09/21/2010 06:57 PM, Stefano Costa wrote:
>
> Il giorno mar, 21/09/2010 alle 10.09 +0100, Leif Isaksen
> ha scritto:
>
> - As a separate issue, a few of us have been toying
> with the idea of
> setting up a Stack Exchange site for Technology in the
> Humanities
> (http://area51.stackexchange.com/). This would have to
> be quite a
> large affair in order to work (i.e. we'd need to rope
> in antiquisters,
> digital classicists, HASTACers, and so on in order to
> reach a
> functioning scale) but it's Q&A format would nicely
> complement both
> the mailing lists (which are good for announcements
> and making
> personal contacts) on the one hand and more
> substantial knowledge
> articles such as the proposed methods wiki on the
> other. In any case,
> if anyone is interested in the initial phase of
> getting it off the
> ground please get in touch offlist.
>
> I will reply in more detail later, but for the moment
> being I'd like to
> point out that a very similar web platform is already
> available on OKFN
> infrastructure, e.g. see http://ask.okfn.org/en/
>
> The major difference (and advantage, IMHO) would be in
> self-hosting and
> capability to license everything under CC-BY.
>
> I've started drafting the current proposal at
> http://archeo.okfnpad.org/methodology-store - please feel
> free to
> contribute.
>
> Ciao,
> steko
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Scanned by iCritical.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-archaeology/attachments/20100923/bd3ed741/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the open-archaeology
mailing list