[open-archaeology] World Archaeology special issue
Ant Beck
ant.beck at gmail.com
Wed Dec 12 15:13:22 UTC 2012
I've put a video online to show how to access this as a number of people
have commented on it not being obvious
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/393477/Temp/RegisteringForFreeAccessToWorldArchaeology.webm
Best
A
On 12/12/12 14:01, Paul Cripps wrote:
> In case folks haven't see, Routledge responded via twitter to apparent lack of access:
> https://twitter.com/Routledge_Arch/status/278769905564782592
>
> Basically, sign up and register on the Taylor & Francis website if you do not have access otherwise (eg via Athens) and you can download the whole volume full-text free of charge. As I have just done and stashed in Mendeley to read one crisp winters day over the festive period.
>
> Ttfn,
> P.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: open-archaeology-bounces at lists.okfn.org [mailto:open-archaeology-bounces at lists.okfn.org] On Behalf Of Colleen Morgan
> Sent: 06 December 2012 14:12
> To: Anthony Beck
> Cc: open-archaeology at lists.okfn.org
> Subject: Re: [open-archaeology] World Archaeology special issue
>
> For what it's worth, we are allowed to post the papers after 12 months, so we are only really looking at 6 months of lock down. Mark Lake has done a fantastic job negotiating this deal and has been great throughout this entire process.
>
> I was conflicted about writing for a paywalled journal, but we need to have as large an audience as possible with the impact that comes with writing in a known journal.
>
> I'm looking forward to reading all of the articles after I file my dissertation next week.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Colleen
> --
> Archaeology Ph.D. Candidate
> Department of Anthropology
> University of California, Berkeley
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Anthony Beck <A.R.Beck at leeds.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Thanks Ben,
>>
>> but the 6 month T&F 'open access' is broadly IMHO an irrelevance.
>> After 6 months the 'final prints' will be locked down (this has been
>> exhaustively debated prior to the publication and is highly unlikely
>> to change). We will not be able to post the final versions anywhere
>> else. We can start to get something sorted out with the 'pre-prints'.
>> This in its own right may provoke an interesting debate about access
>> to archaeological discourse on something that has such broad ramifications as 'open archaeology'.
>>
>>
>> Best
>>
>> A
>> On 06/12/12 10:27, Benjamin Ducke wrote:
>>
>> Originally, there was a deal with T&F
>> to make all papers in this issue available as open access for the
>> first 6 months.
>> Mark L. is looking into why this has not yet happened. Let's give him
>> some time to clarify things with T&F. Then we can discuss how to best
>> make these contributions available as open access in perpetuity.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Ben
>>
>> On 12/06/2012 09:48 AM, Ant Beck wrote:
>>> Apologies...
>>>
>>> Inner-monologue didn't make it to page. The original should have read
>>> -
>>>
>>> If Steko agrees then I (or someone else) can contact Mark and the
>>> rest of the authors, suggest this and co-ordinate any response.
>>>
>>> A
>>> On 06/12/12 08:46, Leif Isaksen wrote:
>>>> Hi Ant
>>>>
>>>> I'm extremely supportive as non-author but I think it should
>>>> probably be a decision to be taken by those who contributed.
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>>
>>>> L.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Ant Beck <ant.beck at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> OK. I am making an assumption that everyone is supportive of this.
>>>>> It would be nice if we could make a big splash and host all the
>>>>> articles as pre-prints in one place (essentially an open mirror to
>>>>> the closed world) with a page that summarises the whole content
>>>>> with links to the full articles.
>>>>>
>>>>> If Steko agrees then I (or someone else) can contact Mark and the
>>>>> rest of the authors and co-ordinate this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Agree? Steko - your opinion as group co-ordinator?
>>>>>
>>>>> A
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/12/12 22:01, Leif Isaksen wrote:
>>>>>> And from me! Whatever the struggles with the publisher, this is an
>>>>>> important contribution so a hearty congratulations to Mark and all
>>>>>> concerned for putting it together.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>
>>>>>> L.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Ant Beck <ant.beck at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 05/12/12 18:06, Jessica Ogden wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 from me too! Many congrats to everyone on the publication.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm looking forward to getting past the paywall and reading
>>>>>>> everyone's contributions to this very important, ongoing discussion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Me too. I'm an author and at an academic institution that does
>>>>>>> not subscribe to World Archaeology. The lack of open access, as
>>>>>>> Steko notes, was a major point of conversation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Jess x
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Ant Beck <ant.beck at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> +1 from me :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 05/12/12 16:40, Stefano Costa wrote:
>>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>>>> Hash: SHA256
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>> as some of you may already know the current issue of World
>>>>>>>>> Archaeology is a special issue, edited by Mark Lake, dedicated
>>>>>>>>> to "Open
>>>>>>>>> Archaeology":
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rwar20/44/4
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Most papers deal with open data, its creation, dissemination
>>>>>>>>> and use.
>>>>>>>>> I have had a chance to read preliminary versions of some papers
>>>>>>>>> and it is truly a state-of-the-art discussion of the potential,
>>>>>>>>> problems and established good practice in this field. As Mark
>>>>>>>>> puts it in the introduction to the volume, there has been a
>>>>>>>>> tendency for literature about open [data|access|source
>>>>>>>>> software] in archaeology to be confined to the realm of
>>>>>>>>> "archaeological computing" and it is only rarely that
>>>>>>>>> mainstream archaeology has a chance to learn about the
>>>>>>>>> ground-breaking developments we are collectively making. In
>>>>>>>>> this sense, the value of this work is going to be reflected
>>>>>>>>> also by the impact it will have on future archaeological work,
>>>>>>>>> globally.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Some of the authors have expressed their discontent (or rather
>>>>>>>>> they are doing it right now as I write, in the twittersphere)
>>>>>>>>> for the contradiction of a volume on "open archaeology" that is
>>>>>>>>> not itself open (i.e. Open Access). Possibly some or all of the
>>>>>>>>> papers could be collected in pre-print form and re-published at
>>>>>>>>> our blog on the OKFN website. We will post any updates here.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Congratulations again to all the authors!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ciao
>>>>>>>>> Stefano
>>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>>>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
>>>>>>>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQv3kEAAoJEDBz7sDeHMxYXycP/jG2l70vv5XC0hMrGEc/qLI
>>>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>>>> 4b7thslfDZA2jeCHLO/h3bt3QCnAWh25HlZERpwosL7TTIApBHB8VGpMFQXUT2I
>>>>>>>>> W
>>>>>>>>> f6JDTEEtprdYe8CpoAF55dlw/WmKN1Iorkre762aSptn52JSDkStRTccVVa9/Zi
>>>>>>>>> J
>>>>>>>>> D+kH/Fz/S/fB/NbYY+lYfQuYoHoG4L7mDQ0AETLfGohji7sQpGIs9FeNbmHciQe
>>>>>>>>> D+w
>>>>>>>>> phvwibZiFBq5GTGJXkkWgtZXn5xd9YRTrlfn+tvr0yVZ8TRBs8e8zGLY3wTX1gX
>>>>>>>>> phvwibZiFBq5GTGJXkkWgtZXn5xd9YRTrlfn+V
>>>>>>>>> 3/enHmfcnsJKrpf4TpSNJ+UydFJ3Jz+lgRbjZJdxOoWhH481xy8Ql143YLZpxVX
>>>>>>>>> n
>>>>>>>>> CsY7OXs1BHeYToPvcJeaMW7hcSugza8eC1lCaX9kY0sj/CYfgFg2P+Xqo0Ok0za
>>>>>>>>> F
>>>>>>>>> umvSJDYG6+lilwUd15lYfrIIbNJ1azNC5NWQ4ddNl1Uk4g/BtsWmzUhg5+4NvZF
>>>>>>>>> umvSJDYG6+7
>>>>>>>>> IGfeUdAEnUT23sAvAXV9nmcvpe3sKuBz15enN0wQqw7D5n0B81noofPawfLtF4F
>>>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>>>> UBslcC1swqOLZAE5j1j6Bz/3UGvClXgQMxm8aurqNP6Z0xYFB122F5N3V6fzvX2
>>>>>>>>> j
>>>>>>>>> qe/BlU2CtwSkpU5F0uXBlnNZDGSm2j76DV1SNA7bA5jpU5Dn9bfvOJJLgEXUbHS
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> SIzBYVpB98djm3fC/n8D
>>>>>>>>> =Bc67
>>>>>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> open-archaeology mailing list
>>>>>>>>> open-archaeology at lists.okfn.org
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-archaeology
>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-archaeology
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> open-archaeology mailing list
>>>>>>>> open-archaeology at lists.okfn.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-archaeology
>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>>>>>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-archaeology
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> open-archaeology mailing list
>>>>>>> open-archaeology at lists.okfn.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-archaeology
>>>>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>>>>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-archaeology
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> open-archaeology mailing list
>>> open-archaeology at lists.okfn.org
>>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-archaeology
>>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-archaeology
>>
>>
>> --
>> Benjamin Ducke
>> {*} Geospatial Consultant
>> {*} GIS Developer
>>
>> benducke at fastmail.fm
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-archaeology mailing list
>> open-archaeology at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-archaeology
>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-archaeology
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Anthony Beck
>> OrdID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2991-811X
>> Research Fellow
>> DART Project
>> School of Computing
>> University of Leeds
>>
>> Follow me on Twitter: AntArch
>> Follow DART on Twitter: DART_Project
>>
>> The DART project website is continually updated
>> www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/dart
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-archaeology mailing list
>> open-archaeology at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-archaeology
>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-archaeology
>>
> _______________________________________________
> open-archaeology mailing list
> open-archaeology at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-archaeology
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-archaeology
>
> Wessex Archaeology Ltd is a company limited by guarantee registered in England, company number 1712772. It is also a Charity registered in England and Wales, number 287786; and in Scotland, Scottish Charity number SC042630. Our registered office is at Portway House, Old Sarum Park, Salisbury, Wilts SP4 6EB. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to us, and immediately and permanently delete it. Do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-archaeology mailing list
> open-archaeology at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-archaeology
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-archaeology
More information about the open-archaeology
mailing list