[open-bibliography] introduction

Tue Jun 29 17:04:34 UTC 2010

I would say that by using named graphs and the like, we can benefit from the
"statement" based metadata form,  while retaining the ability to make
"record"-level assertions about the provenance.

Ben

On Jun 29, 2010 5:54 PM, "Karen Coyle" <kcoyle at kcoyle.net> wrote:

Quoting Jonathan Gray <jonathan.gray at okfn.org>: > Just to follow up from
this -- I understand that ...
One argument is that, AFAIK, no one has come up with a way for the license
terms to travel with the metadata through the many transitions that metadata
naturally goes through. This is particularly true if we move away from
record-based metadata into statement-based metadata.

kc

> > Jonathan > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Patrick Peiffer > <
peiffer.patrick at gmail.com> w...
-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle at kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet

_______________________________________________ open-bibliography mailing
list open-bibliography at ...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-bibliography/attachments/20100629/d93ca84f/attachment-0001.html>