[open-bibliography] Comments on transformed BNB data

Ben O'Steen bosteen at gmail.com
Tue Nov 23 12:33:24 UTC 2010


Using the prefix dc for the DC terms namespace is not incorrect, it is
merely unusual. DC terms does include all the 'legacy' terms and extends
it with a number of extra terms.

The reason why many use the dcterms vs dc prefix is by a rough
convention to let other people know that this is using the more up to
date namespace.

However, your point about the range of dc:issued being highly
restrictive is completely fair. Having to go back and use a namespace
that is already declared to be legacy may not be the best way forward.
If anyone has a suggestion as to which predicate we can use instead,
I'll be glad to hear it.

Ben

On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 12:21 +0000, Deliot, Corine wrote:
> William,
> 
>  
> 
> Just had a look at the sample record available at
> http://eris.okfn.org/ww/2010/11/bl. I have some comments on the Dublin
> Core bit of the record.
> 
>  
> 
> You reference the @prefix:dc as http://purl.org/dc/terms/
> 
>  
> 
> This is not correct. It should be:
> 
>  
> 
> For the legacy namespace, @prefix dc:
> <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/>
> 
> For the /terms/ namespace, @prefix dct or dcterms:
> <http://purl.org/dc/terms/>
> 
>  
> 
> The following properties do not exist:
> 
> dc:isPartOf; dc:extent; dc:issued
> 
>  
> 
> They should be:
> 
> dcterms:isPartOf; dcterms:extent; dcterms:issued
> 
>  
> 
> This is not how the British Library submitted the data. See sample at:
> 
> http://www.bl.uk/bibliographic/datasamples.html
> 
>  
> 
> We mainly made use of Dublin Core properties in the /terms/ namespace;
> the only property in the legacy /elements/1.1/ that we used was
> dc:date. This is because the range of dcterms:date and its
> sub-properties is rdfs:Literal; this didn’t allow us to use the Time
> Ontology in OWL. 
> 
>  
> 
> Cheers
> 
>  
> 
> Corine
> 
>  
> 
> *********************************
> 
> Corine Deliot
> 
> Metadata Standards Analyst
> 
> The British Library
> 
> Boston Spa, Wetherby
> 
> West Yorkshire LS23 7BQ
> 
> e-mail: corine.deliot at bl.uk
> 
> *********************************
> 
>  
> 
> 
> **************************************************************************
> Experience the British Library online at www.bl.uk
>  
> The British Library’s new interactive Annual Report and Accounts
> 2009/10 : www.bl.uk/knowledge
>  
> Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book.
> www.bl.uk/adoptabook
>  
> The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled
>  
> *************************************************************************
>  
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be
> legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you
> are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify
> the postmaster at bl.uk : The contents of this e-mail must not be
> disclosed or copied without the sender's consent. 
>  
> The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the
> author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library.
> The British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of
> the author. 
>  
> ************************************************************************* 
>  Think before you print
> _______________________________________________
> open-bibliography mailing list
> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography






More information about the open-bibliography mailing list