[open-bibliography] Place of Publication data from the BL dataset

[Deliot, Corine]

The conversion currently takes the place of publication, distribution,
etc. from the 260$a. We're considering including the 008/15-17 in future
releases.

Corine

-----Original Message-----
From: open-bibliography-bounces at lists.okfn.org
[mailto:open-bibliography-bounces at lists.okfn.org] On Behalf Of Karen
Coyle
Sent: 2010-11-26 07:27
To: open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
Subject: Re: [open-bibliography] Place of Publication data from the BL
dataset

Quoting William Waites <ww at eris.okfn.org>:


>
> However, suppose you look at a book and figure out in whatever way
> that it was published in Cambridge, Ontario (for argument's sake),
> what is necessary to hook that on the records is ultimately a SPARQL
> query that looks like,

Do the original records have the place of publication code from the  
fixed field? That provides the country (and in some cases country +  
state or province). It could be used to disambiguate place names in  
the publisher area.

kc

>
> INSERT INTO <book_uri>
>  { ?place owl:sameAs <http://sws.geonames.org/5913695/> }
> WHERE
>  { <book_uri> isbd:hasPlaceOfPublicationProductionDistribution ?place
}
>
> Or even better, loop over all books with the same publisher and place
> name label and perform the same operation.
>
> This way, using owl:sameAs like this to ground a blank node is a first
> step in disambiguation. It only adds a piece of information and
> doesn't remove anything. Once we are sure enough that this is correct,
> we can go and replace the blank node with the URI which is a more
> invasive operation because it involves deleting statements.
>
> If we can get there, some sort fun game that people can play that
> creates SPARQL queries like this, we can fix the data.
>
> The nice thing is, when we record provenance (changes) we can keep
> around these queries that were done. They are much clearer and
> understandable (especially if they become only slightly more elaborate
> than the one above) than the brute-force transaction journal
> (changeset) approach to provenance.
>
> Cheers,
> -w
> --
> William Waites
> http://eris.okfn.org/ww/foaf#i
> 9C7E F636 52F6 1004 E40A  E565 98E3 BBF3 8320 7664
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-bibliography mailing list
> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
>



-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle at kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet


_______________________________________________
open-bibliography mailing list
open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography

**************************************************************************
Experience the British Library online at http://www.bl.uk/
 
The British Library’s new interactive Annual Report and Accounts 2009/10 : http://www.bl.uk/knowledge
 
Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book. http://www.bl.uk/adoptabook
 
The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled
 
*************************************************************************
 
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the mailto:postmaster at bl.uk : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent.
 
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the author.
 
*************************************************************************
 Think before you print