[open-bibliography] (Final?) discussion of the openbiblio principles

Fri Jan 7 14:21:08 UTC 2011

Just to bring my final comments to the list (have just added to google
doc too) :

- how about using "secondary" as an alternative to "non-core"
- I think the addendum may be fine as a CSV as opposed to a bulleted list

Great work everyone, it looks really good.

Mark

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> I have read Adrian's latest version, with Karen's additions and I think it's
> excellent. I agree with Karen that we should have a simple para rather than
> bullet list. I also agree with the idea of Core data and the addendum.
>
> I would like to launch this formally at our Symposium on January 17th.
> http://www-pmr.ch.cam.ac.uk/wiki/Main_Page I am speaking at 1700 UTC and
> have 30 minutes but I would like to take a few minutes to launch Open
> Bibliography as a part of Open Scholarship.
>
> I think that we can get modest coverage of this - Nature and BMC will be
> there and if I announce this today we might even get other parties
> interested.
>
> **Adrian is the senior author of this** and I am suggesting that he spend 1
> minute greeting us (time is very tight and we didn't plan this when we
> started!) It would be great if we have all our authors represented on Skype
> even if they only get to say "hi".
>
> The conference booklet will highlight Open Bibliography, the British
> National Bibliography and #jiscopenbib
>
> The presentation will be streamed and recorded. There will also be a
> twitterfall.
>
> If you agree I will announce this as "Launch of Open Bibliography
> Principles"
>
> I am impressed with the compactnerss and precision that the group has
> achieved. I think it will be possible to get a lot of organizations signing
> up to this.
>
>
> P.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Adrian Pohl <adrian.pohl at okfn.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello MJ,
>>
>> > Can we read (and ideally edit) the doc without registering with
>> > Google, please?
>>
>> In fact, all this should already work. I just tested it. Please try
>> again: http://bit.ly/gIfB11
>>
>> Adrian
>>
>> 2011/1/6 MJ Ray <mjr at phonecoop.coop>:
>> > Adrian Pohl wrote:
>> >> [...] I've already made some more changes on the google doc
>> >> and added comments to the document to initiate further discussion, see
>> >> http://bit.ly/gIfB11
>> >>
>> >> I'm looking forward to your thoughts and comments.
>> >
>> > Can we read (and ideally edit) the doc without registering with
>> > Google, please?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > --
>> > MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit
>> > co-op.
>> > Past Koha Release Manager (2.0), LMS programmer, statistician,
>> > webmaster.
>> > In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
>> > Available for hire for Koha work http://www.software.coop/products/koha
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > open-bibliography mailing list
>> > open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
>> > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-bibliography mailing list
>> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
>
>
>
> --
> Peter Murray-Rust
> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> University of Cambridge
> CB2 1EW, UK
> +44-1223-763069
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-bibliography mailing list
> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
>
>