[open-bibliography] (Final?) discussion of the openbiblio principles

[Adrian Pohl]

Hello Jim,

thanks for your valuable input. I incorporated both your proposals
into the document. In principle 3 it now reads: "These licenses make
it impossible to effectively integrate and re-purpose datasets. They
furthermore prevent commercial services which add value to
bibliographic data or commercial activities which could be used to
support data preservation."

I hope everybody is OK with this. Anyway, it's still time for more
changes. e.g. to change the "strongly recommend" part...

As attachment a PDF version of the current principles draft which
Peter might use for the symposium. Fortunately it fits on two pages!
(Karen, as I made some more changes I created a new pdf.)

Adrian

2011/1/7 Jim Pitman <pitman at stat.berkeley.edu>:
> Adrian Pohl <adrian.pohl at okfn.org> wrote:
>
>> I've already made some more changes on the google doc
>> and added comments to the document to initiate further discussion, see
>> http://bit.ly/gIfB11
>
> Overall, it looks very good to me now. Especially, staying away from the copyrighable/non_copyrightable
> issue seems very effective.
> I added a few suggestions like this  [ suggestion JP].
> Adrian, please incorporate as if see fit. Or others could add their approval or disapproval
> inside the [...]. I'm not sure what the protocol is for making changes.
> --Jim
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-bibliography mailing list
> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pobd_20110108.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 75126 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-bibliography/attachments/20110108/3ce97c0b/attachment-0003.pdf>