[open-bibliography] (Final?) discussion of the openbiblio principles

Mon Jan 10 15:07:49 UTC 2011

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>wrote:

>
> > I wouldn't mind dropping the "STRONGLY". What do the others think?
>
> I'm +1 on dropping the STRONGLY. We could still have recommend and can
> phrase as especially applying to public funded institutions (where
> that argument is praticularly strong).
>
> +1 by me. If we all agree then further strength will come from practice -
who knows this may become universal.

> Rufus
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-bibliography mailing list
> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
>

-- 
Peter Murray-Rust
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-bibliography/attachments/20110110/2c127722/attachment-0001.html>