[open-bibliography] (Final?) discussion of the openbiblio principles

Mon Jan 10 15:19:09 UTC 2011

+1 agree drop "STRONGLY"

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> > I wouldn't mind dropping the "STRONGLY". What do the others think?
>>
>> I'm +1 on dropping the STRONGLY. We could still have recommend and can
>> phrase as especially applying to public funded institutions (where
>> that argument is praticularly strong).
>>
> +1 by me. If we all agree then further strength will come from practice -
> who knows this may become universal.
>
>>
>> Rufus
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-bibliography mailing list
>> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
>
>
>
> --
> Peter Murray-Rust
> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> University of Cambridge
> CB2 1EW, UK
> +44-1223-763069
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-bibliography mailing list
> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
>
>