[Open-data-census] Gov Spending Data

[Pierre Chrzanowski]

Hi Charlie, the definition given by the Open Data Census is the following

*Records of actual (past) national government spending at a detailed
transactional level, that is at the level of month to month government
expenditure on specific items (as an example, we would anticipate seeing
many individual records of spending amounts under $1m or even under $100k).
(Note: just a database of contracts awarded or similar is *not* sufficient.
This requires detailed ongoing data on *actual* expenditure)*


On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Charlie Abela <charlie.abela at um.edu.mt>wrote:

>  Can someone explain what is meant by spending data in this context?
> Does it refer to Government's on going revenue and expenditure?
>
> C
>
>
> On 22/10/2013 01:18, Pierre Chrzanowski wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>  I just reviewed Spending Data for countries with a score above 40%,
> excluded the ones Graeme did.
>
>  Here is my reviewing report :
>
>  *Correct entries:*
> US, Brazil, Moldova, Russian Federation,
>
>  *Budget expenditure plan data not spending data:*
> Malta, Nepal, Serbia, Lithuania, Slovakia
>
>  *Not transactionnal data but aggregated spending data:*
> Switzerland, Ireland, Ecuador, Poland, Romania, Korea
>
>  *Cannot review:*
> Singapore (missing link), Greece (under an API), Bulgaria (cannot find
> information on data with the link provided).
>
>  Let we know if we still have time to review those equal or below 40%
> tomorrow.
>
>  Pierre
>
>
>
>
>  On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Graeme Jones <jonesiom at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Similar to Pierre, I researched and reviewed 15 English language offshore
>> jurisdictions but only 1 of the 15 had detailed monthly information or any
>> detailed information.
>>
>>  Graeme Jones
>> Isle of Man Country Editor
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:26:28 +0200
>>> From: Pierre Chrzanowski <pierre.chrzanowski at gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [Open-data-census] Census almost finalized
>>> To: Christian Villum <christian.villum at okfn.org>
>>> Cc: open-data-census <open-data-census at lists.okfn.org>
>>> Message-ID:
>>>         <
>>> CAB-gMssXqhpbGTn7DdN6poPzw4886zy3K+X7L7eJMi7s14hN_g at mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>> Also, I just had a quick look to the results and I found that many
>>> positive
>>> responses for the Gov Spending Data does not comply with the
>>> definition of "spending data at a detailed transactional level".
>>>
>>> Pierre
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Open-data-census mailing list
>> Open-data-census at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-data-census
>>
>>
>
>
>  --
>  *Pierre Chrzanowski*
> *Open Knowledge Foundation France*
>
>  Mail: pierre.chrzanowski at gmail.com
> Mobile: +33 (0)7 855 71 292 | Skype: pierre.chrzanowski | Twitter:
> @piezanowski <https://twitter.com/piezanowski>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Open-data-census mailing listOpen-data-census at lists.okfn.orghttp://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-data-census
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Open-data-census mailing list
> Open-data-census at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-data-census
>
>


-- 
*Pierre Chrzanowski*
*Open Knowledge Foundation France*

Mail: pierre.chrzanowski at gmail.com
Mobile: +33 (0)7 855 71 292 | Skype: pierre.chrzanowski | Twitter:
@piezanowski <https://twitter.com/piezanowski>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-data-census/attachments/20131022/407f4474/attachment.htm>