[open-economics] Fwd: [okfn-discuss] Open Source Finance Meetup in San Francisco, February 20

Wed Feb 13 21:06:00 UTC 2013

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Marc Joffe <marc at publicsectorcredit.org>wrote:

> Alexander****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks for your response. You are welcome to dial in, although it will be
> 3:30am CET on 21 February when I start talking!****
>
> ** **
>
> Several commercial models are available to estimate default probabilities
> for individual, corporate and structured finance credits. While no model is
> perfect, these technologies have enjoyed continuous use at banks and other
> financial institutions for decades. If they didn’t work, I am sure they
> would fall out of use.
>

[alex]
Hehehe :-)
This is a kind of reasoning that is not falsifiable, thus not a very
scientific method of arguing.

I could respond by indicating that we are currently experiencing the
biggest financial crisis of all time and perhaps a dysfunctional mechanism
to handle risk, thus "ratings", might be one of the major reasons why the
world is experiencing this financial crisis.... just saying :-)
[/alex]

> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Much of the difference in interest rates across different fixed income
> asset classes is due to differences in risk estimates by market
> participants. These investors are informally modeling default risk in their
> heads.  Since we know from the behavioral economics literature that people
> aren’t very good at estimating probabilities or weighting multiple factors,
> surely we can get better results by delegating these tasks to a computer
> system that incorporates our study of historical patterns and our
> theoretical understanding of default drivers.
>

[alex]
In the end it always boils down to heuristic methods. Heuristic methods
might work as long as they are not transparent, but once they are, the
subjects rated by the heuristics will anticipate the method and thus make
it fail, because the very act of transparently measuring it will affect the
behavior of the system itself.
[/alex]

> ****
>
> ** **
>
> For more on this please see my recent journal article at
> http://www.econjwatch.org/828.****
>
> ** **
>
> The issue of “gaming” the model is a serious one.
>

[alex]
And the issues will be even bigger if the model is transparent, but please
do not conclude that i argue for a continuation of intransparent ratings.
I think the method of "rating" will never solve the issue at all.
[/alex]

> Once an open source community is established to support a given model, it
> needs to be able to adapt the model to changes in market conditions. Also,
> this concern is not unique to open source solutions. In the run up to the
> financial crisis, issuers adjusted their deal structures to meet published
> rating agency criteria.
>

[alex]
To me, this sounds like a "raise of arms" kind of proposal :-)
Issuers adjust -> Model adapts -> Issuers adjust -> Model adapts -> ...ad
infinitum...->

I think a "raise of arms" solution is not a solution, but a waste of
ressources on both sides. It's more a "cold war" than a real solution, so
to speak.
[/alex]

> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,****
>
> Marc****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* open-economics-bounces at lists.okfn.org [mailto:
> open-economics-bounces at lists.okfn.org] *On Behalf Of *Alexander Praetorius
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 13, 2013 11:52 AM
> *To:* Velichka Dimitrova
> *Cc:* open-economics at lists.okfn.org
> *Subject:* Re: [open-economics] Fwd: [okfn-discuss] Open Source Finance
> Meetup in San Francisco, February 20****
>
> ** **
>
> I'd like to attend.
> I wonder why you think that a calculation could solve the problem.****
>
> What leads to the believe, that something as a "default probability" could
> be calculated at all?
>
> If it is not transparent, then people wonder if they could trust in
> ratings.
> If it is transparent, then people could perfectly anticipate the rating
> method, rendering the rating obsolete, because Sovereign Debt could be
> artificially engineered in a way that optimizes the rating, so that the
> actual rating will never reflect the "true probability of defaulting".
>
> So people will start to interpret the "official open source rating" and
> the problem will start again :-)****
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Velichka Dimitrova <
> velichka.dimitrova at okfn.org> wrote:****
>
> ** **
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Marc Joffe* <marc at publicsectorcredit.org>
> Date: Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:14 PM
> Subject: [okfn-discuss] Open Source Finance Meetup in San Francisco,
> February 20
> To: balug-talk at lists.balug.org, okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org,
> bayarea.members at lists.the-hub.net
>
> ****
>
> Last week’s Department of Justice lawsuit against S&P reminds that five
> years after the financial crisis, the global financial system is still
> broken and constructive solutions remain out of reach. We believe that open
> source tools can bring the transparency that this system needs, and have
> formed a Meetup group in San Francisco to discuss open source /open data
> finance concepts. ****
>
> Our next Meetup is Wednesday, February 20th at 6:00 PM at the offices of
> Kaggle, 188 King Street Unit 502, San Francisco, CA. To attend in person,
> please join the Open Source Finance Meetup<http://www.meetup.com/Open-Source-Finance>group and RSVP. A description of this meeting follows:
> ****
>
> Rating agency assessments of sovereign debt have been in the news for some
> time. In 2011, S&P faced enormous criticism for downgrading the US, while
> all agencies have been criticized for downgrading Greece too late and for
> discriminating against emerging market countries. Less is said about US
> state bond ratings, but interested observers might wonder why California is
> still rated lower than many toxic assets despite balancing its budget.****
>
> Instead of analyst discretion, sovereign and state credit ratings can and
> should be calculated with transparent, open source computer models. Last
> year, I introduced such a model - the Public Sector Credit Framework<http://www.publicsectorcredit.org/pscf.html> -
> which I will demonstrate. The tool uses a combination of Excel and C to
> perform a multi-year fiscal simulation on the target government.****
>
> No food this time, but we are offering a virtual meeting alternative.  Up
> to 24 remote attendees can access the session using GoToMeeting. There is
> no charge for attending a GoToMeeting but you do have to download a small
> client app. Most major platforms are supported. Details are as follows:***
> *
>
> Web Address: https://www3.gotomeeting.com/join/463426174****
>
> Telephone Number: +1 (619) 550-0000****
>
> Access Code: 463-426-174****
>
> Start Time:  6:30 PM Pacific Standard Time****
>
>  ****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-discuss mailing list
> okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> -- ****
>
> Velichka Dimitrova****
>
> Open Economics Project Coordinator****
>
> Open Knowledge Foundation****
>
> http://okfn.org | http://openeconomics.net****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-economics mailing list
> open-economics at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-economics
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-economics****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> -- ****
>
>
> Best Regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen****
>
> ***************************************************
>
> Alexander Praetorius****
>
> Rappstraße 13****
>
> D - 60318 Frankfurt am Main****
>
> Germany****
>
> *[skype] *alexander.praetorius****
>
> *[mail] *citizen at serapath.de <alexander.praetorius at serapath.de>****
>
> *[web] *http://wiki.piratenpartei.de/Benutzer:Serapath ****
>
> ***************************************************
>

-- 

Best Regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
***********************************************
Alexander Praetorius
Rappstraße 13
D - 60318 Frankfurt am Main
Germany
*[skype] *alexander.praetorius
*[mail] *citizen at serapath.de <alexander.praetorius at serapath.de>
*[web] *http://wiki.piratenpartei.de/Benutzer:Serapath
***********************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-economics/attachments/20130213/a9b6dd3f/attachment-0001.html>