[open-economics] About Argentina and Openeconomics
Gustavo Silva
gustavosantaremsilva at gmail.com
Tue Feb 3 10:33:19 UTC 2015
Hi Alejandro and Paul,
First of all, thank you for bringing your article to discussion and for
your interest to get it published in our blog. Also, sorry for not being
able to do so before.
Even though I do not have access to the blog (yet!), I will ask Paul to
hand over a hand to you on the body text and I am going to ask you to mail
the article whenever you two have something ready. How does that sound?
Thank you for your collaboration!
2015-02-03 8:26 GMT+00:00 Paul King <paul.kinguk at gmail.com>:
> Hi, I'm Paul from the UK. I'm and actuary, beekeeper, and rather amateur
> data scientist. I'm not sure which group I'm most able to contribute yet -
> I was hoping to lurk for a while! But Alejandro I would be happy to read
> your article and try to improve the English if it would help.
>
> Paul
>
>
> On 2 February 2015 at 23:54, alejandro baranek <alejandrobaranek at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hello All!
>>
>> I'm Alejandro, form Argentina. I´m not an economist, but a computer
>> scientist with a wide experience in economic analytics.
>> I don't know if you are aware, but in Argentina the official statistics
>> are manipulated, specially the CPI an derivated (Poverty index measured by
>> incomes, real wages, real rate of change) but every official statistics is
>> under suspect. In Jan-29 we had the 8th year conmemoration.
>> Many people are putting a lot of effort for the manipulation to stop, but
>> it didn't worked yet. It's a pretty big problem for us.
>>
>> I wrote a piece for openeconomics blog but they asked me to shorten the
>> text and make some corrections. Maybe someone/s want to help me to correct
>> the text (my english skills are not enoughfor what I want to say, I think)
>> or simply get a read for understanding what is happening here from a first
>> hand source (I was a computer programmer when the political interference
>> started, got fired, etc.). I think we need an openeconomics approach
>> because, there are a lot of alternative estimations of each macroeconomics
>> variable of interest and is very hard to get consensus with all the
>> interested views of the economy. I think is a good place for develop the
>> concepts of OE.
>>
>> I'm actually working in an R package for deploying compbound economics
>> indicator, based on on line sources, for the dates you need. So you have a
>> recipe, the source Indicators and can reproduce every (simple enough)
>> compbound indicators, with the exact sources you are using. Everything can
>> be analyzed and changed. I will write to the group again when a first
>> version is able to be used.
>>
>> Best regards, Alejandro.
>>
>>
>> --
>> alejandro baranek
>> @ken4rab <https://twitter.com/ken4rab>
>> qbotics <http://qbotics.tumblr.com/> | surferinvaders
>> <http://surferinvaders.tumblr.com> | algebraic-soundscapes
>> <http://imaginary.org/content/algebraic-soundscapes> | surfer-shuffle
>> <http://imaginary.org/program/surfer-shuffle>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-economics mailing list
>> open-economics at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-economics
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-economics
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-economics mailing list
> open-economics at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-economics
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-economics
>
>
--
Best Regards / Obrigado e com os melhores cumprimentos,
Gustavo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-economics/attachments/20150203/f5bb02b6/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the open-economics
mailing list