[Open-education] Fwd: Re: Friday Chat: Do we need open policy?
Marieke Guy
marieke.guy at okfn.org
Fri Jun 20 14:25:42 UTC 2014
I don't think Fred's post went to the list.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Open-education] Friday Chat: Do we need open policy?
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 07:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredwbaker at gmail.com>
To: Marieke Guy <marieke.guy at okfn.org>
All:
My dissertation work involved examining higher edu institutions in the
us for policies related to the implementation of openness. There
weren't many available, but it helped me obtain a snapshot of where the
institutions were at.
Part of my argument was also that having the policies, whether they were
supportive of, neutral toward, or opposed to allowing oppenness, would
allow instituions to better deal with instances where faculty were
trying to implement openness in the institution. For example, if
Stanford University had policies in place about openness when Thrun and
others announced the opening of their AI class to the workd over the
weekend (without ever talking to the Stanford Administration) would the
university have had some basis to deal with the class differently?
I found that policies are very important for the implementation of
openness in US higher ed institutions because they serve as enablers,
barriers, or neutral toward the innovation (openness) and help guide
faculty and others in decision making.
—
Best
Fredrick W. Baker III
Email: Fredwbaker at gmail.com
Twitter: @fredwbaker
Web: www.fredwbaker.com
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change
something, build a new model that makes the existing model
obsolete."~Buckminster Fuller
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Marieke Guy <marieke.guy at okfn.org
<mailto:marieke.guy at okfn.org>> wrote:
This question is 'borrowed' from the Cetis Conference (see my blog
post on the open practice to open policy session
<http://education.okfn.org/cetis-conference-2014-time-to-unhide-open/>)
;-)
Policy often lags behind practice - so is it necessary? Does it
actually work in encouraging openness? Is grassroots activity better
- or do we need to work from both directions? What examples are
there of open policy working? Should it work on an institutional,
national or sectoral level? Is it just about OERs or should it be
about all aspects of education, or openness in general? Who leads on
policy? How far should policy reach i.e. public sector or commercial
too? Is there confusion with open policy making?
We have a few sections on this in the handbook (what policy is
there?
<http://booktype.okfn.org/open-education-handbook/_draft/_v/1.0/what-policy-is-there-relating-to-open-education/>,
how do you convince policy makers?
<http://booktype.okfn.org/open-education-handbook/_draft/_v/1.0/how-do-you-convince-policy-makers-about-open-education/>,
what is open policy?
<http://booktype.okfn.org/open-education-handbook/_draft/_v/1.0/what-is-open-policy/>)
Any thoughts??
Marieke
Links
http://openpolicynetwork.org
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/OER_Policy_Registry
http://www.poerup.info
Remember if you have an idea for a Friday chat add it to the
etherpad <http://pad.okfn.org/p/Open_Education_Working_Friday_Chats>.
--
Marieke Guy
LinkedUp <http://linkedup-project.eu/> Project Community Coordinator
| skype: mariekeguy | tel: 44 (0) 1285 885681 | @mariekeguy
<http://twitter.com/mariekeguy>
Open Knowledge <http://okfn.org/>
/Empowering through Open Knowledge/
http://okfn.org/ | @okfn <http://twitter.com/okfn>| OKF on Facebook
<%3Fhttps://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork%3F> | Blog
<%3Fhttp://blog.okfn.org%3F> | Newsletter
<%3Fhttp://okfn.org/about/newsletter/%3F>
http://remoteworker.wordpress.com
Have you bought your tickets <http://2014.okfestival.org/tickets/>
to OKFestival yet? Join us in Berlin!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-education/attachments/20140620/7d6397f8/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the open-education
mailing list