[open-heritage] PSI directive & GLAM

Tue Sep 25 14:54:59 UTC 2012

ok, let's get this thing moving !
I created a pad  - http://okfnpad.org/glam-psi
if you guys could fill up the bullet points with the important points to be
addressed in the document (considering that it should not be longer than 1
or 2 pages), I can start drafting up something and try to get some more
people involved in the drafting / review of the doc.
thanks  :)

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Daniel Dietrich
<daniel.dietrich at okfn.org>wrote:

> I am in drafting this.
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
> On 24 Sep 2012, at 16:27, Primavera De Filippi wrote:
>
> > Hi all, and thank you Javier for the wiki !
> > I think we should start drafting a document (1 or 2 pages) based on that
> schema so as to precisely express what we think is wrong about the current
> proposal for the PSI.
> > I'm happy to work on it if anyone else volunteers to do it with me   :)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Javier Ruiz <javier at openrightsgroup.org>
> wrote:
> > http://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/PSI_Directive
> >
> > --
> > Javier Ruiz
> > javier at openrightsgroup.org
> > +44(0)7877 911 412
> > @javierruiz
> >
> > On Monday, 24 September 2012 at 10:27, Alek Tarkowski wrote:
> >
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> Maybe we could collect all this information (links, documents, comments)
> >> in one place - on some pad or wiki? Any ideas where we could host this?
> >>
> >> best,
> >>
> >> Alek
> >>
> >> On 21/09/12 12:59 , Primavera De Filippi wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>> after the workshop last wednesday, we started to work on identifying
> >>> the issues of the proposed PSI directive as regards GLAM institutions.
> >>> Find attached the schematic representation of our preliminary analysis
> >>> based on the danish compromise version (attached). We would love to
> >>> hear comments or feedback about how to improve it.
> >>>
> >>> We have set up a little task-force of people interested in drafting a
> >>> document (rather short) describing the identified problems, we would
> >>> like to know if anyone is willing to join us.
> >>> The goal would be that Communia would then take action into
> >>> influencing the amendment process for the directive.
> >>>
> >>> Also, if you are in contact with local MEPs or national negotiating
> >>> teams in the Council, please let us know if you would be able to help
> >>> circulate the document.
> >>>
> >>> We also need to know the deadlines to send comments - Erik and Amelia
> >>> have been really helpful at providing information concerning the
> >>> process, but we need the exact timelines to coordinate our actions.
> >>>
> >>> Useful links:
> >>>
> http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/actions_eu/policy_actions/index_en.htm
> >>>
> http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/cult/ad/912/912049/912049en.pdf
> >>>
> http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/juri/pa/909/909674/909674en.pdf
> >>>
> http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/com_com(2011)0877_/com_com(2011)0877_en.pdf
> >>> <
> http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/com_com%282011%290877_/com_com%282011%290877_en.pdf
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> dr Alek Tarkowski
> >> koordynator / public lead
> >> Creative Commons Polska / Poland
> >> www: http://creativecommons.pl
> >> identica: http://identi.ca/alek
> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/atarkowski
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> open-glam mailing list
> >> open-glam at lists.okfn.org
> >> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-glam
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > open-glam mailing list
> > open-glam at lists.okfn.org
> > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-glam
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-glam/attachments/20120925/57e524d8/attachment-0001.html>