[open-government] Examples of open data leading to increase in data quality?

Tue Aug 27 18:17:04 UTC 2013

Great question, I would also love to hear some solid examples - documenting
this stuff is very hard.

For my anecdotal part, I've certainly reported lots of bugs in machine
readable data to the House of Representatives <http://clerk.house.gov/> and
to the Federal Register <https://www.federalregister.gov/>, and they've
fixed all of them promptly.

My understanding from working with people who work with UsaSpending.gov
data is that once FFATA <https://www.federalregister.gov/> created the
portal and mandated it be machine readable, the data got much better and
more complete. But I don't have any documentation for that.

-- Eric

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Jonathan Gray <jonathan.gray at okfn.org>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I wonder if anyone has any good examples or evidence of how open data (or
> - more generally - publicly released machine readable data) has led to an
> increase in data quality?
>
> All the best,
>
> Jonathan
>
> --
>
> Jonathan Gray
>
> Director of Policy and Ideas  | *@jwyg <https://twitter.com/jwyg>*
>
> The Open Knowledge Foundation <http://okfn.org/>
> *
>
> Empowering through Open Knowledge
>
> okfn.org  |  @okfn <http://twitter.com/OKFN>  |  OKF on Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> |
> Blog <http://blog.okfn.org/>  |  Newsletter<http://okfn.org/about/newsletter>
> *
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-government mailing list
> open-government at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-government
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-government
>
>

-- 
Developer | sunlightfoundation.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-government/attachments/20130827/41a6bec6/attachment-0001.html>