[open-linguistics] CC licenses

Fri Jun 1 11:46:12 UTC 2012

An interesting article and perspective pointed out to me be Jeff Good
regarding licenses and OA:

http://cameronneylon.net/blog/open-access-for-the-other-85/

-Steve

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Sebastian Nordhoff <
sebastian_nordhoff at eva.mpg.de> wrote:

>
>
> On 06/01/2012 12:26 PM, Michael Cysouw wrote:
>
>> Please do *NOT* use CC-ND. That makes it completely impossible to re-use
>> data afterwards. For our kinds of goals the "non-derivative" clause is the
>> most problematic of all.
>>
>
> Dear Michael,
> the above phrase referred to videos. I do think that there are many cases
> where you only have the choice between CC-ND and no CC at all because the
> subjects of your videos will be afraid of occurring in weird mashups or
> whatnot.
> This does explicitly not refer to textual data.
> Best
> Sebastian
>
>
>
>>
>> On 31 May 2012, at 23:27, Sebastian Nordhoff wrote:
>>
>>  I would probably only release those data as CC-No Derivatives,
>>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> open-linguistics mailing list
>> open-linguistics at lists.okfn.**org <open-linguistics at lists.okfn.org>
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/**listinfo/open-linguistics<http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-linguistics>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> open-linguistics mailing list
> open-linguistics at lists.okfn.**org <open-linguistics at lists.okfn.org>
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/**listinfo/open-linguistics<http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-linguistics>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-linguistics/attachments/20120601/c05df696/attachment-0001.html>