[open-linguistics] open-linguistics Digest, Vol 33, Issue 8

[Paul Buitelaar]

John, all, not sure if this has come up yet in respect to Categories for 
data in the LLOD Cloud Diagram, but I would suggest to align with the 
LRE map where possible:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LRE_Map


Paul


On 13/07/2013 12:00, open-linguistics-request at lists.okfn.org wrote:
> Send open-linguistics mailing list submissions to
> 	open-linguistics at lists.okfn.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-linguistics
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	open-linguistics-request at lists.okfn.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	open-linguistics-owner at lists.okfn.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of open-linguistics digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. Re: Categories for data in the LLOD Cloud Diagram
>        (Christian Chiarcos)
>     2. Re: Categories for data in the LLOD Cloud Diagram (Jonathan Pool)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:46:30 +0200
> From: "Christian Chiarcos" <christian.chiarcos at web.de>
> Subject: Re: [open-linguistics] Categories for data in the LLOD Cloud
> 	Diagram
> To: open-linguistics at lists.okfn.org, "Dave Lewis"
> 	<dave.lewis at cs.tcd.ie>
> Message-ID: <op.wz38rsefyoucrc at christian-pc>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> Hi Dave,
>
>> It raises an interesting question of whether bi-text should be a
>> classification by itself, or is a characterization of the _link_ between
>> two monolingual resources.
>
> We had this discussion yesterday, as well, I think that both views are
> feasible and should probably be left to the data providers. There are
> other multilingual ressources, e.g., interlinear glosses as harvested in
> ODIN (http://linguistics-ontology.org/project/4?), where data for some
> single language may be so marginal (say, 10 sentences or so, for a
> selected language) that a language-by-language split wouldn't make much
> sense. This is what prevents me from a general recommendation to represent
> bitext (in whatever definition) as links between two monolingual resources.
>
> But maybe, this wouldn't bitext after all, would it?
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:39:16 -0700
> From: Jonathan Pool <pool at panlex.org>
> Subject: Re: [open-linguistics] Categories for data in the LLOD Cloud
> 	Diagram
> To: open-linguistics at lists.okfn.org
> Message-ID: <51E06974.3060204 at panlex.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
>> The proposal is that we should divide language resources into 6 broad
>> categories
>
> Sorry I missed the meeting today.
>
> If this is a partition, I think it is likely to create disagreement
> about (1) how many categories should exist, (2) which categories should
> exist, and (3) which category should be assigned to each resource.
>
> Less prescriptive solutions might be considered:
>
> A. Allowing multiple categories to be assigned to the same resource.
>
> B. Allowing additional categories to be created.
>
> C. Allowing multiple coexisting authorities to create sets of categories
> and assign them to resources.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-linguistics mailing list
> open-linguistics at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-linguistics
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/optionss/open-linguistics
>
>
> End of open-linguistics Digest, Vol 33, Issue 8
> ***********************************************
>