[open-linguistics] Linguistic glossaries

[Menzo Windhouwer]

Hi, All,

There is also the Lexicon of Linguistics:

	http://www2.let.uu.nl/uil-ots/lexicon/

Although, not being a linguist myself, I can't say I used it ;-)

Best,

Menzo Windhouwer
--
The Language Archive ­ tla.mpi.nl
Max-Planck-Institute for Psycholinguistics




On 6/11/13 08:38, "Judith Eckle-Kohler"
<eckle-kohler at ukp.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:

>Dear all,
>
>I found Glottopedia sometimes useful in the parse, although it is quite
>sparse for particular topics:
>
>http://www.glottopedia.org
>
>Best
>Judith
>--
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Dr. Judith Eckle-Kohler
>Senior Researcher
>Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab (UKP Lab)
>FB 20 Computer Science Department
>Technische Universität Darmstadt
>Hochschulstr. 10, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany
>phone [+49] (0)6151 16-6166, fax -5455, room S2/02/B115
>eckle-kohler at ukp.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de
>www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de/people/senior-staff/dr-judith-eckle-kohler/
>
>www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de
>Knowledge Discovery in Scientific Literature www.kdsl.tu-darmstadt.de
>Web Research at TU Darmstadt (WeRC) www.werc.tu-darmstadt.de
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>________________________________________
>Von: open-linguistics-bounces at lists.okfn.org
>[open-linguistics-bounces at lists.okfn.org]" im Auftrag von
>"Christian Chiarcos [christian.chiarcos at web.de]
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Juni 2013 07:41
>An: A list for those interested in open data in linguistics.; Tom Morris
>Betreff: Re: [open-linguistics] Linguistic glossaries
>
>This entire discussion has taken a somewhat unexpected turn ...
>
>> I didn't read any of this into Christian's response -- as a matter of
>> fact,
>> just the opposite.  He said that those who disagreed with SIL (and he
>> didn't say he was one of them), sometimes *preferred* to work with SIL
>> derivatives instead of direct SIL products.
>
>Thank you for pointing that out. The whole SIL discussion was merely to
>accomodate for Marías original remark that
>
>> I know the SIL one but I think someone mentioned some concerns about it.
>
>... and these concerns sometimes might have an ideological basis more than
>a linguistic one. No SIL-bashing intended. Also the quoting wasn't that
>selective either, I only omitted the concrete example reference for the
>"standard linguistic resources" mentioned along with SIL.
>
>So, shall we focus again on the original question? Is anyone aware of any
>other recommendable human-readable (and preferrably openly licensed)
>terminology repository that we can recommend? (Aside from helping María,
>we might actually put a list on the wiki, if something substantial emerges
> from this discussion.)
>
>Along with sections on linguistic terms in Wikipedia, Wiktionary, etc. we
>have
>
>- SIL linguistic terms
>- GOLD*
>- ISOcat*
>- TDS ontology*
>- grammis**
>
>(* intended to be machine-readable rather than human-readable)
>(** German only)
>
>Anything else?
>
>All the best,
>Christian
>--
>Christian Chiarcos
>Applied Computational Linguistics
>Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt a. M.
>60054 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
>
>office: Robert-Mayer-Str. 10, #401b
>mail: chiarcos at informatik.uni-frankfurt.de
>web: http://acoli.cs.uni-frankfurt.de
>tel: +49-(0)69-798-22463
>fax: +49-(0)69-798-28931
>
>_______________________________________________
>open-linguistics mailing list
>open-linguistics at lists.okfn.org
>http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-linguistics
>Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-linguistics
>
>_______________________________________________
>open-linguistics mailing list
>open-linguistics at lists.okfn.org
>http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-linguistics
>Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-linguistics