[open-linguistics] Linguistic glossaries

[Judith Eckle-Kohler]

Dear all,

I found Glottopedia sometimes useful in the parse, although it is quite sparse for particular topics:

http://www.glottopedia.org

Best
Judith
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. Judith Eckle-Kohler
Senior Researcher
Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab (UKP Lab)
FB 20 Computer Science Department
Technische Universität Darmstadt
Hochschulstr. 10, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany
phone [+49] (0)6151 16-6166, fax -5455, room S2/02/B115
eckle-kohler at ukp.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de
www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de/people/senior-staff/dr-judith-eckle-kohler/

www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de
Knowledge Discovery in Scientific Literature www.kdsl.tu-darmstadt.de
Web Research at TU Darmstadt (WeRC) www.werc.tu-darmstadt.de

-------------------------------------------------------------------

________________________________________
Von: open-linguistics-bounces at lists.okfn.org [open-linguistics-bounces at lists.okfn.org]" im Auftrag von "Christian Chiarcos [christian.chiarcos at web.de]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Juni 2013 07:41
An: A list for those interested in open data in linguistics.; Tom Morris
Betreff: Re: [open-linguistics] Linguistic glossaries

This entire discussion has taken a somewhat unexpected turn ...

> I didn't read any of this into Christian's response -- as a matter of
> fact,
> just the opposite.  He said that those who disagreed with SIL (and he
> didn't say he was one of them), sometimes *preferred* to work with SIL
> derivatives instead of direct SIL products.

Thank you for pointing that out. The whole SIL discussion was merely to
accomodate for Marías original remark that

> I know the SIL one but I think someone mentioned some concerns about it.

... and these concerns sometimes might have an ideological basis more than
a linguistic one. No SIL-bashing intended. Also the quoting wasn't that
selective either, I only omitted the concrete example reference for the
"standard linguistic resources" mentioned along with SIL.

So, shall we focus again on the original question? Is anyone aware of any
other recommendable human-readable (and preferrably openly licensed)
terminology repository that we can recommend? (Aside from helping María,
we might actually put a list on the wiki, if something substantial emerges
 from this discussion.)

Along with sections on linguistic terms in Wikipedia, Wiktionary, etc. we
have

- SIL linguistic terms
- GOLD*
- ISOcat*
- TDS ontology*
- grammis**

(* intended to be machine-readable rather than human-readable)
(** German only)

Anything else?

All the best,
Christian
--
Christian Chiarcos
Applied Computational Linguistics
Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt a. M.
60054 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

office: Robert-Mayer-Str. 10, #401b
mail: chiarcos at informatik.uni-frankfurt.de
web: http://acoli.cs.uni-frankfurt.de
tel: +49-(0)69-798-22463
fax: +49-(0)69-798-28931

_______________________________________________
open-linguistics mailing list
open-linguistics at lists.okfn.org
http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-linguistics
Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-linguistics