[open-linguistics] GOLD not reachable

[Christian Chiarcos]

True, most of GOLD is mirrored in ISOcat, but this was a curated effort by
the RELISH project (https://tla.mpi.nl/relish/), so I'm not sure whether
it's really complete with respect to concepts and if theren aren't any
deviations (corrections) that have been applied while moving from OWL to
ISOcat. In any case, the limited expressivity of ISOcat doesn't allow to
capture OWL axioms (if GOLD has defined any -- need to check), so you
should not expect to find the full semantics in  there, either. The
definitions, however, and hierarchical relations should have been
preserved. In any case, most of this had been done in 2012 (maybe 2013) and
I doubt there would have been updates afterwards.

Best,
Christian

2015-01-28 10:30 GMT+01:00 Hedvig Skirgård <hedvig.skirgard at gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> I happen to know more about this. It's been like this since Linguist List
> moved their offices, they've said that they would get everything up and
> running soon after they've installed themselves in the new place, but it
> hasn't happened. I've been on contact with them about this, I'll email them
> again now.
>
> In the meantime, all of GOLD is included in ISOCat: http://www.isocat.org
>
> /Hedvig
>
> ____________________________________
> Sharing is caring, if you stumble across something you think I might find
> interesting then send it my way. I do the same.
>
> Please forgive me for any mistakes of orthography (especially Swedish and
> French diacritics), I try to answer as fast as possible and sometimes that
> results in less than optimal key board output.
>
> 2015-01-28 9:10 GMT+01:00 Bettina Klimek <klimek at informatik.uni-leipzig.de
> >:
>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I was about to have a closer look at the GOLD ontology but unfortunately
>> it seems, that something is broken. At least I cannot reach it via
>> http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/vocabs/gold. There is, however, this
>> file https://ckannet-storage.commondatastorage.googleapis.
>> com/2014-10-19T09:35:54.447Z/gold-2010.owl. But it I am not sure if this
>> is the last version and if it is complete.
>>
>> Does anyone know, who I could contact to get some information what is
>> going on and if this problem will be fixed or does anyone happen to have a
>> more recent version of the OWL file (if one exists).
>>
>> Similiarly, I have trouble finding data in ODIN (
>> http://odin.linguistlist.org/). Do we provide meta data such as "dataset
>> not maintained any more" to separate up to date data sets from those which
>> still have data files but are not maintained any more. It seems that quite
>> some data sets only persist as long as the project under which it was
>> compiled.
>>
>> How do we deal with such cases? Do we leave this issue to the data
>> providers?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bettina
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bettina Klimek
>> PhD Student
>> Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
>> Institute for Applied Informatics (InfAI)
>> Research Group: http://aksw.org
>> Email: klimek at informatik.uni-leipzig.de
>> Office Tel.: +49 341-97-32273
>> Office: Augustusplatz 10, Room P905, 04109 Leipzig
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-linguistics mailing list
>> open-linguistics at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-linguistics
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-linguistics
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-linguistics mailing list
> open-linguistics at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-linguistics
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-linguistics
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-linguistics/attachments/20150128/38891e75/attachment-0003.html>