[open-linguistics] Paper on progress of the OWLG Group

Mon Oct 12 19:39:01 UTC 2015

Dear all,
        First, I would like to thank the main contributors of the paper -
it looks great to me ;-).
        Second, I made some editorial changes (written in bold and in red,
and leaving the previous text conveniently commented nearby, just in case).
In addition, I also fixed the alternance between Lider/LIDER to LIDER, and
changed the LLOD-LSA mentions to LLOD at LSA (I hope you do not mind).
        Third, I confirm that I will add the corresponding [short]
description of LLOD at LSA 2015 to the final paper.
        Finally, I have also added myself to the list of
authors/contributors.
        Best,
                          Antonio.


2015-10-11 21:01 GMT+02:00 Gerard de Melo <gdm at gmx.net>:

> Hi Christian,
>
> > To clarify my thinking when mentioning selected resources: This list was
> > deliberately incomplete. Those selected provide reference vocabulary.
> > So, if there is an external open resource directly using FrameBase for
> > sense ids (like the WordNet ILI or DBpedia) or as a terminological
> > resource (like PHOIBLE for phonological features -- even though rarely
> > used, there is no alternative if you want to say something about
> > phonology), it definitely should be in. Otherwise, only if space
> > permits. It would meet the first criterion if it yields a more
> > satisfying representation of FrameNet data than we currently have.
> >
> > We can of course extend this for exemplary resources (being nominated
> > for a price is a good criterion, actually), but this will have to be in
> > another section and I'm  a bit sceptical wrt. space.
>
> Oh, sorry, I didn't mean to give it the same status as the vocabularies
> mentioned there -- I was just trying to save space.
>
> The goals are indeed quite different from those vocabularies and also
> from resources providing sense IDs or other entity IDs. Instead of
> providing a schema or identifiers for describing linguistic entities, we
> are providing a linguistically grounded schema for representing regular
> knowledge, e.g. marriages, employment, etc. So one could say that we are
> trying to provide a schema and instance data that incorporate parts of
> the regular LOD cloud into the LLOD world.
>
> Anyway, feel free to remove it from the abstract and perhaps even from
> the full paper.
>
> Gerard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-linguistics mailing list
> open-linguistics at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-linguistics
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-linguistics
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-linguistics/attachments/20151012/acd8f055/attachment-0003.html>