[open-literature] open correspondence hacking

[print.crimes]

On 30/05/2010 11:22, Rufus Pollock wrote:
> On 29 May 2010 18:15, print.crimes<print.crimes at yatterings.com>  wrote:
>    
>> Rufus,
>>
>> As a follow up to the Skype conversation.
>>
>> Thanks for sorting out the json error on the server.
>>
>> I've been doing a little work on open correspondence. I've added rdf links
>> to the html views of the letters so they link together. The rdf endpoint has
>> validated on the W3C validator.
>>
>> I'll concentrate on writing some tests and to refactor some of the code as
>> per your suggestion to the dictionaries. I'll wait for you to do the bits
>> and pieces to the timeline before I start doing that though to make sure
>> that we don't duplicate/overwrite any code.
>>      
> Sounds good. I might get jsonification in as part of my work on
> timelines but if we keep each other informed unlikely we step on each
> other's toes :)
>    
I'll give you a shout before I do anything major in that area.
>    
>> I've got a 'to do' note in my calendar to write a blog post to send the
>> Jonathan for the OKF blog tomorrow or at least the first draft.
>>      
> Great
>
>    
>>   Do you want the features/events to be put onto the open shakespeare trac so
>> that the open literature features are in one place? I know we've talked
>> about it but can't remember or re-create the open letters trac?
>>      
> Yes, I think we may as well user shakespeare trac for time being
> (should really be called openliterature trac in any case ...)
>    
I'll start updating once I've made sense of my notes from last night.
Iain