[Open-science-nl] estafette vs NL_Wetenschap

Sun Feb 3 11:21:10 UTC 2019

Hi all, NPOS friends,

about two years ago I tried to set up an NPOS estafette, but it did not
turn out the way I wanted too, with too long period between contributions.
It got too political, I think.

On Twitter we now have @NL_Wetenschap which has a lot of advantages:

1. Tweets are just a lot easier
2. I think the have several people lined up
3. not about the message but about the researcher
4. clear topic what to tweet about: daily actitivies
5. Dutch

What if we reboot the NPOS Estafette as:

1. @NL_OpenScience
2. we make sure we have 5-10 people lined up
3. tweets are about open science activities (open data, open standards,
open source, open (i.e. proper open license) access
4. no politics, only action

What do you think?

One question: Dutch or English? Or up to tweeter?

Egon

-- 
Hi, do you like citation networks? Already 51% of all citations are
available <https://i4oc.org/> available for innovative new uses
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/acs2ioc>. Join me in asking the American
Chemical Society to join the Initiative for Open Citations too
<https://www.change.org/p/asking-the-american-chemical-society-to-join-the-initiative-for-open-citations>.
SpringerNature,
the RSC and many others already did <https://i4oc.org/#publishers>.

-----
E.L. Willighagen
Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT
Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/)
Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList: https://www.zotero.org/egonw
ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286 <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-0286>
ImpactStory: https://impactstory.org/u/egonwillighagen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science-nl/attachments/20190203/c42b97a6/attachment.html>