[open-science] Definitions of Open Science?
mn at michaelnielsen.org
Thu Jul 28 14:30:33 UTC 2011
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, cameron.neylon at stfc.ac.uk wrote:
> I would say that the definitions, or at least visions that came out of
> the meeting in Geneva are as good as any. My personal position is that
> 'open science' is too big and diverse a church to capture with a single
> definition without offending at least some members of the broader
> community. Easier to articulate shared aims and to define more specific
> practices or beliefs within that.
I can definitely agree with that! This is part of why I'm not comfortable
making a more formal definition of the term. I especially like Cameron's
More information about the open-science