[open-science] Definitions of Open Science?

[Peter Murray-Rust]

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Jo Walsh <metazool at fastmail.net> wrote:

> Started a list http://okfnpad.org/rfringe11-open-scholarship
>
> Glad of the responses. Perhaps we are looking for a declaration rather than
> a definition. To say "we are doing Open Scholarship because we are doing X
> and Y". Then wouldnt have to be too exhaustive or qualified...
>

Do you mean Scholarship or Science? They are significantly different>

>
> Not sure when is the session planned for? Am otherwise engaged on the 4th
> most of the day :/
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
>
> Michael Nielsen <mn at michaelnielsen.org> wrote:
>>
>>  On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, cameron.neylon at stfc.ac.uk wrote: > I would say that
>> the definitions, or at least visions that came out of > the meeting in
>> Geneva are as good as any. My personal position is that > 'open science' is
>> too big and diverse a church to capture with a single > definition without
>> offending at least some members of the broader > community. Easier to
>> articulate shared aims and to define more specific > practices or beliefs
>> within that. I can definitely agree with that! This is part of why I'm not
>> comfortable making a more formal definition of the term. I especially like
>> Cameron's last sentence! Cheers, Michael
>>
>


-- 
Peter Murray-Rust
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20110729/881b81ee/attachment-0001.html>