[open-science] OKFest - Call for Proposals

• Previous message: [open-science] this "data curation" of which you speak
• Next message: [open-science] Doctoral funding for open science research
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Indeed I am aware as it was discussed at the hypothes.is reputation and
identity workshop and I have it on my toolbar!  To Jessy/Peter's point,
however, I haven't made it part of my workflow for anything yet. Tools and
practices co-evolve and it seems to me that the tools side of annotation is
currently ahead of the practices side. What are the clearest and most
compelling use cases right now?

William Gunn
+1 646 755 9862
http://synthesis.williamgunn.org/about/




On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>wrote:

> On 3 April 2012 19:33, William Gunn <william.gunn at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I really like the open peer review stuff too. The current prototype of
> > hypothes.is works like this: you have a browser plugin that you invoke
> on a
> > page you'd like to annotate, those annotations are stored in your
> account at
> > hypothes.is and are available to others browsing the page with the
> plugin
> > installed, according to the reputation and identity model. At this
> stage, I
>
> In case you are not aware :-) we already run an annotation service at
> http://annotateit.org/ - there was big blog post announcing v1.0
> yesterday: <http://blog.okfn.org/2012/04/03/annotateit-and-annotator/>
>
> This is powered by the open-source Annotator tool the Foundation have
> been developing for last few years: http://okfnlabs.org/annotator/ (JS
> for doing web annotation)
>
> We're actively working with Hypothes.is (they are using and
> contributing to the Annotator tool) -- in contrast to annotateit.org
> they are doing lots of work on the identity and filtering side of
> things (whose annotations to show to the average person).
>
> > would say it's just something to be aware of, not necessarily something
> to
> > design for, but I do like their plan for annotation servers that will
> allow
> > for a distributed architecture.
>
> You can already run your own annotation server right now - part of the
> Annotator suite is a reference backend implementation (that we use to
> run AnnotateIt.org): <https://github.com/okfn/annotator-store>. Doing
> real "distributed" would be some work (how would syncing work across
> servers) but I note that the ultimate backend layer is ElasticSearch
> which does sharding *very* nicely.
>
> Rufus
>
> > William Gunn
> > +1 646 755 9862
> > http://synthesis.williamgunn.org/about/
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:06 AM, <open-science-request at lists.okfn.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Today's Topics:
> >>
> >>   1. Re: OKFest - Call for Proposals (Jessy Kate Schingler)
> >>   2. Re: OKF tools: ckan.org, thedatahub.org (Jessy Kate Schingler)
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:59:17 -0700
> >> From: Jessy Kate Schingler <jessy at jessykate.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [open-science] OKFest - Call for Proposals
> >> To: Laura Newman <laura.newman at okfn.org>
> >> Cc: open-access at lists.okfn.org, Leo Lahti <leo.lahti at iki.fi>,   Kat
> >>        Braybrooke <kat.braybrooke at okfn.org>,   open-science
> >>        <open-science at lists.okfn.org>
> >> Message-ID:
> >>
> >>  <CA+bBsE=b5TDsVQcQwd9E0c-6aarLUXDmw2EvWoXw4RxQEXobOQ at mail.gmail.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
> >>
> >>
> >> carl, thanks and i agree that the science markup would fit as a
> component
> >> of that session (i've moved it to reflect as much in the etherpad). it
> >> would be cool to develop the structure of that session a bit more
> >> together,
> >> if it goes ahead and you are game.
> >>
> >> regarding the earlier idea about reviewing open science tools... i was
> >> thinking that perhaps a more focused activity than just broadly
> reviewing
> >> tools, might be to do a deep dive into understanding workflows around
> open
> >> peer review. that seems to be a core challenge the open science
> community
> >> is trying to address right now.
> >>
> >> there's peerevaluation.org, papercritic.com, hypothes.is (i don't know
> >> exactly what format their system is proposing to take)... but also the
> >> question of how we handle, recognize and incorporate reviews and
> comments
> >> on blog posts, systems like arxiv.org, the PLoS system, and questions
> of
> >> pre- and post- publication review, etc.
> >>
> >> i think there's people on this list who are much more involved and
> >> familiar
> >> with the ins and outs of these challenges than i am, but i feel like
> that
> >> would be a useful session/activity. what do people think?
> >>
> >> jessy
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Laura Newman <laura.newman at okfn.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Fantastic!
> >> >
> >> > Thanks Jessy, some excellent suggestions and glad to see that someone
> >> > had
> >> > beaten me to it and added them to the etherpad already :)
> >> >
> >> > I've noticed a couple of others adding to the etherpad as well -
> >> > absolutely great, keep the ideas coming! Be as creative as you like,
> we
> >> > can
> >> > deal with the details later ;) Etherpad here:
> >> > http://science.okfnpad.org/OKFest
> >> >
> >> > This is looking really good, thank you everyone for your contributions
> >> > and
> >> > enthusiasm!
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Laura
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Carl Boettiger
> >> > <cboettig at gmail.com>wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Jessy, list,
> >> >>
> >> >> These sound great to me, you've piqued my interest.
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm continually evolving my open notebook system (which of course I
> try
> >> >> to document in the
> >> >> notebook<
> http://www.carlboettiger.info/archives/category/ons-thoughts>,
> >>
> >> >> in between the science posts) and would love to bounce ideas off of
> >> >> other
> >> >> practitioners more often.  I'm particularly interested in how to keep
> >> >> content clean enough to be intelligible, complete enough to be
> >> >> reproducible, while also keeping the process simple/automatic enough
> to
> >> >> actually be doable (i.e. save time instead of take extra time).
> >> >>
> >> >> I think it's also a good platform to experiment with the science
> markup
> >> >> concepts you mention.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Carl
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Jessy Kate Schingler <
> >> >> jessy at jessykate.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> hey all,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> some ideas on the open science front specifically, riffing off of
> the
> >> >>> "experimental" format a bit:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> open notebook practitioners - workshop and feedback session
> >> >>> - required to have an open notebook or commit to creating one to
> >> >>> attend
> >> >>> :)
> >> >>> - discuss form, content, composability, discoverability, lessons
> >> >>> learned, etc.
> >> >>> - how can we better link together/leverage work being put in the
> open
> >> >>> by
> >> >>> open researchers?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> research statement video booth!
> >> >>> - get open science practitioners to record a < 1m video of their
> >> >>> research interests/research statement, and put them online.
> >> >>> - can also talk about value they derived from using x,y,z open
> science
> >> >>> tools/practices.
> >> >>> - get people excited about playing with open science tools, humanize
> >> >>> and
> >> >>> make science approachable
> >> >>>
> >> >>> science markup - design session (or maybe a debate style?)
> >> >>> - using RDF(a)/microdata to make science on the web more
> discoverable.
> >> >>> - what structure would people find useful
> >> >>> - what efforts have been attempted and failed/petered out and why?
> >> >>> - how/would they use such things?
> >> >>> - what authoring tools and plugins could exist to support it.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> just brainstorming... not sure if any of those pique others'
> >> >>> interests...
> >> >>> jessy
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Laura Newman
> >> >>> <laura.newman at okfn.org>wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Hi all,
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> As many of you may have spotted, the Call for Proposals for OKFest
> >> >>>> was
> >> >>>> officially launched today! You can read's Kat's blog post here:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> http://blog.okfn.org/2012/03/28/okfestival-call-for-proposals-released-with-a-twist/
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> We should definitely propose an Open Science stream. The deadline
> for
> >> >>>> proposals is 20th April. You can see the format our proposal will
> >> >>>> need to
> >> >>>> take here:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dGY5bTNkT05wd2ZkUS1EZktJVFE4UGc6MQ
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The etherpad we began planning on is actually looking pretty
> healthy.
> >> >>>> Many thanks to everyone who has contributed already. It would be
> >> >>>> great to
> >> >>>> get as many ideas down there as possible before we submit the
> >> >>>> proposal
> >> >>>> though, so do take a minute to have another look. In particular,
> they
> >> >>>> are
> >> >>>> keen for sessions to take place in various formats, not just the
> >> >>>> traditional talk / panel. We've had a couple of ideas for hands on
> >> >>>> drafting
> >> >>>> and tool-testing sessions, but do keep thinking and suggesting! The
> >> >>>> etherpad is here:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> http://science.okfnpad.org/OKFest
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I have rearranged the original text to fit the form for the OKFest
> >> >>>> Call
> >> >>>> for Proposals. Please add, comment and edit away!
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I have included the formal text for the Call for Proposals below
> this
> >> >>>> email.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Thanks everyone!
> >> >>>> Laura
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> OPEN KNOWLEDGE FESTIVAL - CALL FOR PROPOSALS*
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> First Round Deadline: April 20th 2012
> >> >>>> Second Round Deadline: June 1st 2012
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> *OPEN KNOWLEDGE FESTIVAL*
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> We are delighted to announce that this year?s Open Government Data
> >> >>>> Camp
> >>
> >> >>>> and Open Knowledge Conference are joining to form a week-long
> >> >>>> celebration:
> >> >>>> the *Open Knowledge Festival*!
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> This pioneering event will include an action-packed week of
> lectures,
> >> >>>> seminars, workshops, hackathons, coding jams, and interactive
> >> >>>> sessions that
> >> >>>> will bring together individuals and organizations from a wide
> variety
> >> >>>> of
> >> >>>> backgrounds to exchange ideas, make things and meet new people.
> >> >>>> OKFest will
> >> >>>> also highlight the diversity of Finland?s open knowledge
> communities
> >> >>>> to a
> >>
> >> >>>> new international audience, with a specific effort to encourage the
> >> >>>> participation of representatives from Nordic nations.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Join us in Helsinki, Finland on 17-22 of September 2012 for a week
> of
> >> >>>> open knowledge and global inspiration.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> *THEME: OPEN KNOWLEDGE IN ACTION*
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The 2012 theme of OKFestival is *Open Knowledge in Action*. We will
> >> >>>> focus on the /value/that can be generated by opening up knowledge,
> >> >>>> the
> >> >>>> ecosystems of organisations that benefit from and participate in
> >> >>>> sharing,
> >> >>>> and the impact that open knowledge can have in our societies. What
> >> >>>> kinds of
> >> >>>> new professions, ideas and community initiatives can emerge within
> >> >>>> our
> >> >>>> governments, markets, networks and neighbourhoods as a result of
> >> >>>> these
> >> >>>> engagements?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The exploration of this theme will not only be visible in the
> >> >>>> festival?s content, but also in its implementation as the first
> >> >>>> global
> >>
> >> >>>> event of its kind. At OKFestival, we will experiment with new forms
> >> >>>> of
> >> >>>> collaboration, new workshop formats and new forms of participation.
> >> >>>> We?ll
> >>
> >> >>>> bring together civil society representatives, programmers, data
> >> >>>> wranglers,
> >> >>>> designers, students, members of government and local communities
> for
> >> >>>> a week
> >> >>>> of building new things and sharing great ideas.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> *CALL FOR PROPOSALS*
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> We have *two submission deadlines*this Spring based on our venue
> >> >>>> capacity at the *Aalto University School of Arts, Design and
> >> >>>> Architecture*in Helsinki. We suggest applying as soon as possible
> in
> >> >>>> order
> >> >>>> to ensure adequate venue space, support and funding for your
> >> >>>> proposals.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> First Round Deadline: April 20th 2012
> >> >>>> Second Round Deadline: June 1st 2012
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> We are looking for proposals related to specific open knowledge and
> >> >>>> open data topics, but also new viewpoints and cross-cutting issues
> >> >>>> which
> >> >>>> may help us to understand how open knowledge is working in our
> >> >>>> society.
> >> >>>> Examples of such topics are the well-being of communities, civil
> >> >>>> society
> >> >>>> and citizen empowerment, democracy, entrepreneurship, smart cities,
> >> >>>> sustainability etc.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> More information at http://www.okfestival.org
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>> Laura Newman
> >> >>>> Community Coordinator
> >> >>>> Open Knowledge Foundation
> >> >>>> http://okfn.org/
> >> >>>> Skype: lauranewmanonskype
> >> >>>> Twitter: @Newmanlk
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>> open-science mailing list
> >> >>>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> >> >>>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> Jessy
> >> >>> http://jessykate.com
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> open-science mailing list
> >> >>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> >> >>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Carl Boettiger
> >> >> UC Davis
> >> >> http://www.carlboettiger.info/
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Laura Newman
> >> > Community Coordinator
> >> > Open Knowledge Foundation
> >> > http://okfn.org/
> >> > Skype: lauranewmanonskype
> >> > Twitter: @Newmanlk
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jessy
> >> http://jessykate.com
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL:
> >> <
> http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20120403/c71d3516/attachment-0001.htm
> >
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 2
> >> Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 11:06:46 -0700
> >> From: Jessy Kate Schingler <jessy at jessykate.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [open-science] OKF tools: ckan.org, thedatahub.org
> >> To: open-science at lists.okfn.org, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche at pobox.com>
> >> Message-ID:
> >>
> >>  <CA+bBsEmDsmtS4wFLLL47N0dJBO-LfRWfwwqFFo5hJVy5QKbeGA at mail.gmail.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
> >>
> >> hi tom,
> >>
> >> perhaps rufus or someone else could clarify about the pricing, since it
> is
> >> a bit confusing... my interpretation was that thedatahub.org is free,
> at
> >> least for individuals? alternatively, if not, i think it would be worth
> >> setting one up as a free service for this purpose, and managing it as a
> >> community...
> >>
> >> jessy
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche at pobox.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Jessy Kate Schingler Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:23:52 -0700 (rearranged)
> >> > > is there a reason people find ckan/thedatahub insufficient for data
> >> > > management needs?
> >> >
> >> > You're presupposing folks even know about these tools. (Never overlook
> >> > ignorance as a cause of behavior :-) Before your post I hadn't seen
> >> > either. I'm still generally ignorant regarding the OKF--being US-based
> >> > probably doesn't help, but mostly I'm head-down in my work, coming up
> >> > occasionally to "scratch itches," like, why am I cut'n' pasting so
> >> > @#$%^&! much? (A: because I can't send OP links to content on my
> >> > current wiki, because its firewall's admins are such a PITA.) What I
> >> > know, and hence seems useful to me in this domain, are sites/tools
> >> > like github, google, sourceforge (etc) which I've used.
> >> >
> >> > > is it related to technical/features, or to peoples' familiarity and
> >> > > confidence around the longevity of the site?
> >> >
> >> > Regarding CKAN, it's probably
> >> >
> >> > http://ckan.org/solutions/pricing/
> >> > >> FREE[:] Deploy your own community instance hosted on your servers.
> >> >
> >> > If I had my own servers, my life would be rather different. I might be
> >> > more productive, but I don't have time to be an admin (famous last
> >> > words). I would also hafta eat pet food to afford
> >> >
> >> > >> CKAN Catalogue[:] from $400 / ?300 a month
> >> >
> >> > (which might also degrade my productivity, though maybe not :-)
> >> >
> >> > > i'm starting to learn about [thedatahub.org], it seems rather
> >> > > perfect for data set management, and even has a change lists for
> >> > > data sets, groups, user pages, etc.
> >> >
> >> > I'm unclear on the relationship between thedatahub.org and CKAN:
> >> > instance to framework? If so, what is thedatahub.org's data store,
> and
> >> > how is that priced?
> >> >
> >> > I suspect these tools would be quite attractive to folks with my needs
> >> > but more $. Unfortunately, being presently near bottom of both the
> >> > academic foodchain and the income distribution drives many decisions.
> >> >
> >> > FWIW, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche at pobox.com>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > open-science mailing list
> >> > open-science at lists.okfn.org
> >> > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jessy
> >> http://jessykate.com
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL:
> >> <
> http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20120403/1451e2fe/attachment.htm
> >
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> open-science mailing list
> >> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> >> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> >>
> >>
> >> End of open-science Digest, Vol 42, Issue 8
> >> *******************************************
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > open-science mailing list
> > open-science at lists.okfn.org
> > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Co-Founder, Open Knowledge Foundation
> Promoting Open Knowledge in a Digital Age
> http://www.okfn.org/ - http://blog.okfn.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20120404/9096ce49/attachment-0001.html>

• Previous message: [open-science] this "data curation" of which you speak
• Next message: [open-science] Doctoral funding for open science research
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]