[open-science] response to the White House RFI on OA to publicly funded research

[Daniel Mietchen]

Dear all,

I am sitting over this right now (though mostly offline, reading
through responses prepared by others) and shall post some rough draft
text today at

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Committee/Areas_of_interest/Open-access_policy/Request_for_Information_on_Public_Access_to_Peer-Reviewed_Scholarly_Publications_Resulting_From_Federally_Funded_Research

and

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Committee/Areas_of_interest/Open-access_policy/Request_for_Information_on_Public_Access_to_Digital_Data_Resulting_From_Federally_Funded_Scientific_Research

Any hint/ suggestion is very welcome.

Daniel


On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> There is an opportunity to argue the case for making pub,icly funded
> research publicly available:
>
> See http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/2012-January/000063.html
>
> I think we should put something together. Indeed I think it would be useful
> to have an off-the-shelf document that can be re-used in future invitations
>
> It is noteworthy that Harvard argues for CC-BY publication and against
> CC-NC.
>
> --
> Peter Murray-Rust
> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> University of Cambridge
> CB2 1EW, UK
> +44-1223-763069
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>