No subject

Sun Mar 31 09:34:23 UTC 2013

otherwise the conclusions will not be really "useful". In other words, I
think that you would like to say in your stories or results page, that a
given paper was reported as closed and that N different people agreed that
it is closed for public view.

These are just random thoughts, I'm just brainstorming :-) Comments are
welcomed!

Cheers,

Daniel=E2=80=8B

--047d7b5d9c6b3f4e2804e7d27e8d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><di=
v>Hi Joe,<br><br></div>I
 think the connections with OAButton and CrowdCrafting have a lot of=20
possibilities. From my point of view, one that could be very useful for=20
you is the validation of reported closed papers/journals:<br>
<br></div>1.- A user reports a blocked paper with your tool.<br></div>2.- Y=
our server stores that info, and automatically creates a task in a CrowdCra=
fting app that you own.<br></div>3.- 30 (or more) people review that paper,=
 so you can statistically analyzed the answers regarding if it is closed or=
 not.<br>

</div>4.- You get all the answers for that specific paper, validate them, a=
nd publish them in your site as a story.<br><br></div>In the case of Peter&=
#39;s idea:<br><br></div>1.- The 9K references are created as tasks in a Cr=
owdCrafting app.<br>

</div>2.- People answer all the questions that he wants to address, plus on=
e that is really relevant to your project.<br></div>3.-
 They gather all the answers, do the statistical analysis, and with the=20
conclusions automatically push that data to your platform.<br>
<br></div>If you want, they can include the button as part of the task.=20
The idea is to report directly to your platform which papers are not=20
accessible from CrowdCrafting.org. However, this may end up in=20
generating too much noise for you, as if I&#39;m not mistaken you would lik=
e
 to have &quot;validated revisions&quot;. What do you think? <br>
<br>From my experience, crowdsourced projects should include a=20
validation step, otherwise the conclusions will not be really &quot;useful&=
quot;.=20
In other words, I think that you would like to say in your stories or=20
results page, that a given paper was reported as closed and that N=20
different people agreed that it is closed for public view.<br>
<br></div>These are just random thoughts, I&#39;m just brainstorming :-) Co=
mments are welcomed!<br><br></div>Cheers,<br><br>Daniel=E2=80=8B</div>

--047d7b5d9c6b3f4e2804e7d27e8d--