[open-science] A *hint* of a *possible* response from Elsevier

[Peter Murray-Rust]

It costs Elsevier almost nothing to "discuss". I'm still waiting for a
reply from @wisealic.


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Graham Steel <steelgraham at hotmail.com>wrote:

> See this thread from Twitter this afternoon
> https://twitter.com/jaynedmarks/status/461856168621916160
>
> Graham
>
>
>
> H: +44 (0)141 422 1483 *(after 18.00 GMT)*
>
> C: +44 (0)7900441046
>
> E: *steelgraham7 at gmail.com <steelgraham7 at gmail.com>*
>
> Fav: *http://www.plos.org* <http://www.plos.org/> - research made public
>
> Fb: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=709026752
>
> Blog: http://mcblawg.blogspot.com/
>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/McDawg
>
> FriendFeed: http://friendfeed.com/mcdawg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>
>


-- 
Peter Murray-Rust
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20140501/85624b3a/attachment-0003.html>