[open-science] [Open-access] Elsevier: some facts, by Tim Gowers

[Fabiana Kubke]

I would argue that Nature and Science profits should be considered
separately from other types of journals. A large volume of their content is
not original research articles but rather commentaries and opinion pieces -
so in a way they are half a research article journal and half the
equivalent of something like the TImes Higher Education. Remove all the
research articles and I would still subscribe to the journal as I do for
THE. I am not sure that considering the profit of Nature magazine is
comparable to considering the profit margin of say Journal of Comparative
Neurology.
-F


On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 1:40 AM, P Kishor <punk.kish at gmail.com> wrote:

> Scott, others,
>
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:33 AM, S.C. Edmunds <scott at gigasciencejournal.com
> > wrote:
>
>> If Tom is compiling the per country comparisons
>
>
>
> Per country comparisons are great, but is there a way to find out profit
> margins and expenses for other publishers such as Science, Nature, well,
> all others, as well? Is there a canonical resource for such data?
>
>
> --
> Puneet Kishor
> Manager, Science and Data Policy
> Creative Commons
>



-- 
M Fabiana Kubke
Chair Advisory Panel Creative Commons Aotearoa New
Zealand<http://www.creativecommons.org.nz/>
Department of Anatomy | University of Auckland | New Zealand
(+64) 9 373-7599 Ext 86002 | (+64)9 923 6002 (direct) | Mobile: (+64) 210
437 121

Skype: superfabs | http://twitter.com/Kubke | http://twitter.com/DrKupcake|
http://blogs.plos.org/mindthebrain/ | http://kubke.wordpress.com |
http://buildingblogsofscience.wordpress.com |
http://sciblogs.co.nz/building-blogs-of-science |
http://popscinz.wordpress.com | http://talkingteaching.wordpress.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20140503/75cfb12f/attachment-0003.html>