[open-science] Voting For Planet Software

[Ivan Ferrero]

If I may, we should think about the goal, then the steps to achieve it,
then the tools needed.

Otherwise how are we able to suggest the right platform, considering that
each has strength and weakness? :-)

Dr Ivan Ferrero - Psicologo Tecniche Mente-Corpo
333-4339624
ivan.ferrero1975 at gmail.com
http://ivanferrero.it

via Zurigo 24/4
20147 Milano

2014-10-01 23:49 GMT+02:00 Svetlana Belkin <belkinsa at ubuntu.com>:

> On 10/01/2014 03:19 PM, Bill Mills wrote:
> > Agree that a determining factor has to be the convenience and
> > familiarity of whoever is generously volunteering to maintain the thing.
> > Would totally be open to presenting options and arguments for and
> > against, but ultimately the maintainer needs something they can pilot
> > without it taking over their life. That being said, if the maintainer is
> > willing to dive into whatever option the community wants, feel free to
> > take a poll :)
>
> I guess you guys are right.  I think I was just overwhelmed with the
> e-mail over the subject.
> --
> Svetlana Belkin
> A.K.A: belkinsa
> User Wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/belkinsa
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20141002/49ef157e/attachment-0003.html>