[open-science] How do we know open science is more efficient than what we do now?
daniel.mietchen at googlemail.com
Tue Aug 19 15:28:42 UTC 2014
There is a workshop going on right now in which we are trying to draft
a proposal for actually putting open science to a test:
Later on, drafting will continue via
Hope to see you there!
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Daniel Mietchen
<daniel.mietchen at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
> I assume that many on this list are sympathetic to the idea that open
> science is more efficient than the way research normally proceeds now, and
> experiences with the Polymath projects, the EHEC sequence annotation and
> Open Source Malaria all fit that picture. However, the assumption has never
> been tested systematically, and I think that once that were achieved, we
> would have better chances to get scientists, science funders and research
> administrators to actually consider the matter.
> One chance that I see to move this forward is the Knights News Challenge, to
> which I have submitted a proposal at
> that can be fine-tuned until April 27.
> I would appreciate your comments, or if you could help spread the word.
> Thanks and cheers,
More information about the open-science