[open-science] Why do you use MediaWiki?

[Ivan Ferrero]

Ho Liz no problem at all: I'm open minded about this topic, and always glad
to know about alternate platforms.

I see this Public Lab may be good to create collaborative projects and
decision making oriented wikis.

Can you write some links of websites that use this platform?

Maybe we can go on private to not to go off topic?
Or is there a forum to ask my questions?

TNX!

---

Dr Ivan Ferrero - Psicologo Tecniche Mente-Corpo
333-4339624
ivan.ferrero1975 at gmail.com

http://ivanferrero.it

via Zurigo 24/4

20147 Milano


Il 20/gen/2015 15:16 "Liz Barry" <liz at publiclab.org> ha scritto:

> Hi all!
> Great thread! I have set up many a wiki, so i hope you will pardon me for
> this forthcoming shameless plug ;)
>
> The Public Lab website is open source and designed for massively
> attributing individual contributions to open science and technology:
>
> https://github.com/publiclab/plots2
> publiclab.org
>
> There are several other communities who have set up their own version of
> the website and we love working together to develop new features that we
> can all use.
>
> Yours,
> Liz
>
>
> --
>
> Liz Barry
> director of community development
> @publiclab <http://twitter.com/publiclab>
> publiclab.org
> +1-336-269-1539
>
> *Love our work? Become a Public Lab Sustaining Member
> <http://publiclab.org/donate>today!*
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Pierre-Carl Langlais <
> pierrecarl.langlais at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I guess the main reason that sums up it all is : a huge community of
>> developers, well-funded by the Wikimedia Foundation. That means a wide
>> range of extensions, help and support. Imho, it is actually  easier to
>> customize a MediaWiki software (by combining the appropriate extensions
>> and some css magic) rather than attempting to use a lesser known version
>> of wiki (which may be fine initially, but means a lot of struggle to
>> find the appropriate information or set up some additional functions).
>>
>> PCL
>>
>> Le 20/01/15 14:49, Lukasz Bolikowski a écrit :
>> > Hi Ivan,
>> >
>> > Raphael has some good points, let me expand them.  Assuming you want
>> > to use *a wiki* for a collaborative website, there are several reasons
>> > why to choose MediaWiki:
>> >
>> > 1) Many of your contributing users have probably contributed to
>> > Wikipedia as well, so they know the mark-up, they can re-use some of
>> > the nice coding tricks employed in Wikipedia (e.g. copy-and-paste
>> > infoboxes), they can easily adopt Wikipedia's collaboration
>> > principles, they already know what categories are for, how to use a
>> > talk page, etc.
>> >
>> > 2) Thanks to Wikipedia, MediaWiki is a very stable and actively
>> > developed piece of software.  There's a rich family of extensions.  It
>> > is even possible that one of your power users has written an extension
>> > him/herself.
>> >
>> > 3) Visiting users (viewers) see a familiar UI.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Lukasz
>> >
>> >
>> > On 01/20/2015 02:21 PM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
>> >> On 1/20/15 1:56 PM, Ivan Ferrero wrote:
>> >>> I always hear about the MediaWiki platform: why?
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-science mailing list
>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20150120/bb2b30e5/attachment-0003.html>