[open-science] Open Science Policy Platform - Open Science Working Group Representative
Cameron Neylon
cn at cameronneylon.net
Wed May 25 17:59:57 UTC 2016
Not me either. Will be interesting to see how much it is dominated by
organisations as opposed to community representatives.
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:00 PM Daniel Mietchen <
daniel.mietchen at googlemail.com> wrote:
> I did not get in either.
> d.
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Konrad Förstner <konrad at foerstner.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > same here - I didn't get in. I hope a least somebody from the
> > community made it into it.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Konrad
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed May 25, 2016 at 02:28:07PM +0100, Jenny Molloy wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear All
> >>
> >> Thank you very much for your support in this application, but I'm afraid
> >> that I
> >> was not accepted on to the Open Science Policy Platform as the Open
> >> Knowledge/
> >> Open Science Working Group representative.
> >> Fingers crossed that one of the several other members of our community
> >> that
> >> applied got in!
> >>
> >> Any news Cameron, Daniel, Roman, Bjoern, Chris? I have probably
> forgotten
> >> others...
> >>
> >> The accepted nominations will be published here on 27 May:
> >> https://ec.europa.eu
> >> /research/openscience/index.cfm
> >>
> >> Jenny
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Jenny Molloy <jenny.molloy at okfn.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear Open Science Working Group
> >>
> >> Konrad Förstner suggests we should put forward someone for the EU
> Open
> >> Science Policy Platform.
> >> More info: https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=
> >> open-science-policy-platform
> >>
> >> This would be a good chance to take forward our views and interests
> at
> >> a
> >> high level in EU science policy. The nominations need to be in next
> >> Tuesday
> >> so it's a bit last minute!
> >>
> >> I have been considering it and would be happy to put myself forward,
> >> but if
> >> anyone else strongly wants to be the representative then please let
> us
> >> all
> >> know.
> >>
> >> Also, it would be great to get a feeling for who else is going for
> this
> >> and
> >> whether it is looking like there is a good set of applications from
> the
> >> open community.
> >>
> >> Best wishes
> >> Jenny
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> open-science mailing list
> >> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> >> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > open-science mailing list
> > open-science at lists.okfn.org
> > https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>
--
Professor Cameron Neylon
Centre for Culture and Technology
Curtin University, Western Australia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20160525/d669ff38/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the open-science
mailing list