[open-science] Open Science Policy Platform - Open Science Working Group Representative

Wed May 25 23:36:46 UTC 2016

same outcome here. 

--
mobile phone +49 176 213 044 66

While I may be sending this email outside my normal office hours, I have no expectation to receive a reply outside yours.

> On 25 May 2016, at 18:59, Daniel Mietchen <daniel.mietchen at googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
> I did not get in either.
> d.
> 
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Konrad Förstner <konrad at foerstner.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> same here - I didn't get in. I hope a least somebody from the
>> community made it into it.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Konrad
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed May 25, 2016 at 02:28:07PM +0100, Jenny Molloy wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear All
>>> 
>>> Thank you very much for your support in this application, but I'm afraid
>>> that I
>>> was not accepted on to the Open Science Policy Platform as the Open
>>> Knowledge/
>>> Open Science Working Group representative.
>>> Fingers crossed that one of the several other members of our community
>>> that
>>> applied got in!
>>> 
>>> Any news Cameron, Daniel, Roman, Bjoern, Chris? I have probably forgotten
>>> others...
>>> 
>>> The accepted nominations will be published here on 27 May:
>>> https://ec.europa.eu
>>> /research/openscience/index.cfm
>>> 
>>> Jenny
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Jenny Molloy <jenny.molloy at okfn.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>   Dear Open Science Working Group
>>> 
>>>   Konrad Förstner suggests we should put forward someone for the EU Open
>>>   Science Policy Platform.
>>>   More info: https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=
>>>   open-science-policy-platform
>>> 
>>>   This would be a good chance to take forward our views and interests at
>>> a
>>>   high level in EU science policy. The nominations need to be in next
>>> Tuesday
>>>   so it's a bit last minute!
>>> 
>>>   I have been considering it and would be happy to put myself forward,
>>> but if
>>>   anyone else strongly wants to be the representative then please let us
>>> all
>>>   know.
>>> 
>>>   Also, it would be great to get a feeling for who else is going for this
>>> and
>>>   whether it is looking like there is a good set of applications from the
>>>   open community.
>>> 
>>>   Best wishes
>>>     Jenny
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> open-science mailing list
>>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-science mailing list
>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20160526/cf89c789/attachment-0003.html>