[open-science] Open Science Policy Platform - Open Science Working Group Representative
Bastian Greshake
bgreshake at googlemail.com
Wed May 25 23:36:46 UTC 2016
same outcome here.
--
mobile phone +49 176 213 044 66
While I may be sending this email outside my normal office hours, I have no expectation to receive a reply outside yours.
> On 25 May 2016, at 18:59, Daniel Mietchen <daniel.mietchen at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> I did not get in either.
> d.
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Konrad Förstner <konrad at foerstner.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> same here - I didn't get in. I hope a least somebody from the
>> community made it into it.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Konrad
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed May 25, 2016 at 02:28:07PM +0100, Jenny Molloy wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear All
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for your support in this application, but I'm afraid
>>> that I
>>> was not accepted on to the Open Science Policy Platform as the Open
>>> Knowledge/
>>> Open Science Working Group representative.
>>> Fingers crossed that one of the several other members of our community
>>> that
>>> applied got in!
>>>
>>> Any news Cameron, Daniel, Roman, Bjoern, Chris? I have probably forgotten
>>> others...
>>>
>>> The accepted nominations will be published here on 27 May:
>>> https://ec.europa.eu
>>> /research/openscience/index.cfm
>>>
>>> Jenny
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Jenny Molloy <jenny.molloy at okfn.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Open Science Working Group
>>>
>>> Konrad Förstner suggests we should put forward someone for the EU Open
>>> Science Policy Platform.
>>> More info: https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=
>>> open-science-policy-platform
>>>
>>> This would be a good chance to take forward our views and interests at
>>> a
>>> high level in EU science policy. The nominations need to be in next
>>> Tuesday
>>> so it's a bit last minute!
>>>
>>> I have been considering it and would be happy to put myself forward,
>>> but if
>>> anyone else strongly wants to be the representative then please let us
>>> all
>>> know.
>>>
>>> Also, it would be great to get a feeling for who else is going for this
>>> and
>>> whether it is looking like there is a good set of applications from the
>>> open community.
>>>
>>> Best wishes
>>> Jenny
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> open-science mailing list
>>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-science mailing list
>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20160526/cf89c789/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the open-science
mailing list