[open-science] Open Science Policy Platform - Open Science Working Group Representative

Fri May 27 10:06:32 UTC 2016

I didn't notice another thread 'Nominated Members of the Open Science
Policy Platform' had been started - nominated members have already started
responding to that one so please ignore my last message!
https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/2016-May/004210.html

Jenny

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jenny Molloy <jcmcoppice12 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Bastian!
> A few familiar names on there and I am more optimistic...I was getting a
> bit worried that it would look like any other science policy committee.
> Maybe as a working group we should adopt someone as our go-to person if we
> would like to feedback our views?
> Michela Vignoli has been accepted as the Young European Associated
> Researchers Network (YEAR) representative and is a member of the Open
> Knowledge Austria Open Science Working Group so would be the natural person
> to ask if she is willing!
>
> Are any of the accepted nominees on the list and now able to announce
> their success? :)
>
> Jenny
>
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Bastian Greshake <
> bgreshake at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> The list is out now:
>>
>> http://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/ospp_nominated_members.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bastian
>>
>> --
>> mobile phone +49 176 213 044 66
>>
>> While I may be sending this email outside my normal office hours, I have
>> no expectation to receive a reply outside yours.
>>
>> On 26 May 2016, at 09:46, Mike Taylor <mike at indexdata.com> wrote:
>>
>> So just to be clear -- as far as we know, not ONE actual open-science
>> advocate has been accepted onto the so-called Open Science Policy
>> Platform. Correct? (Hopefully I missed someone.)
>>
>> If they took on Alicia Wise I'm going to be very upset.
>>
>> -- Mike.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 26 May 2016 at 08:40, Roman Gurinovich <roman.gurinovich at xpansa.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> the same for me.
>>
>> Curious if selection procedure is known
>>
>> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Bastian Greshake <
>> bgreshake at googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> same outcome here.
>>
>> --
>> mobile phone +49 176 213 044 66
>>
>> While I may be sending this email outside my normal office hours, I have
>> no expectation to receive a reply outside yours.
>>
>> On 25 May 2016, at 18:59, Daniel Mietchen <daniel.mietchen at googlemail.com
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> I did not get in either.
>> d.
>>
>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Konrad Förstner <konrad at foerstner.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> same here - I didn't get in. I hope a least somebody from the
>> community made it into it.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Konrad
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed May 25, 2016 at 02:28:07PM +0100, Jenny Molloy wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dear All
>>
>> Thank you very much for your support in this application, but I'm afraid
>> that I
>> was not accepted on to the Open Science Policy Platform as the Open
>> Knowledge/
>> Open Science Working Group representative.
>> Fingers crossed that one of the several other members of our community
>> that
>> applied got in!
>>
>> Any news Cameron, Daniel, Roman, Bjoern, Chris? I have probably forgotten
>> others...
>>
>> The accepted nominations will be published here on 27 May:
>> https://ec.europa.eu
>> /research/openscience/index.cfm
>>
>> Jenny
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Jenny Molloy <jenny.molloy at okfn.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Dear Open Science Working Group
>>
>>  Konrad Förstner suggests we should put forward someone for the EU Open
>>  Science Policy Platform.
>>  More info: https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=
>>  open-science-policy-platform
>>
>>  This would be a good chance to take forward our views and interests at
>> a
>>  high level in EU science policy. The nominations need to be in next
>> Tuesday
>>  so it's a bit last minute!
>>
>>  I have been considering it and would be happy to put myself forward,
>> but if
>>  anyone else strongly wants to be the representative then please let us
>> all
>>  know.
>>
>>  Also, it would be great to get a feeling for who else is going for this
>> and
>>  whether it is looking like there is a good set of applications from the
>>  open community.
>>
>>  Best wishes
>>    Jenny
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-science mailing list
>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-science mailing list
>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-science mailing list
>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-science mailing list
>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Roman Gurinovich
>>
>> Director, XPANSA Group | Business Systems and Data Analysis
>>
>> /// site  : xpansa.com
>> /// mail  : roman.gurinovich at xpansa.com
>> /// phone, PL : +48502994586
>> /// skype : roman.gurinovich
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-science mailing list
>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-science mailing list
>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20160527/2bbedaa0/attachment-0003.html>