[open-science] Elsevier are telling "mis-truths" about the extent of paywalled open access

• Previous message: [open-science] Elsevier are telling "mis-truths" about the extent of paywalled open access
• Next message: [open-science] Elsevier are telling "mis-truths" about the extent of paywalled open access
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Whether or not other list members wish to agree or disagree, speak or remain silent, both remains to be seen and is besides the point. 

What is beyond doubt is that you hijacked Ross's thread and changed the topic so the discussion was no longer about Elsevier, their behavior and how to tackle it. As Ale, myself and Tom Morris hinted to various degrees, this is not about CC licenses. Please don't do that…

> On Feb 22, 2017, at 1:01 AM, Heather Morrison <Heather.Morrison at uottawa.ca> wrote:
> 
> At this point I would like to know if there is consensus on this point. Do any list members wish to argue the point that simply applying a CC license is sufficient to ensure OA?

• Previous message: [open-science] Elsevier are telling "mis-truths" about the extent of paywalled open access
• Next message: [open-science] Elsevier are telling "mis-truths" about the extent of paywalled open access
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]