[openbiblio-dev] need help in intigrating the Active Directory

Tue Nov 23 12:33:29 UTC 2010

Dear developers,

I need to intigrate the Active Directory to Open Biblio. please help me in
this regard

thank you
Jayadev

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:30 PM, <openbiblio-dev-request at lists.okfn.org>wrote:

> Send openbiblio-dev mailing list submissions to
>        openbiblio-dev at lists.okfn.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/openbiblio-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        openbiblio-dev-request at lists.okfn.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        openbiblio-dev-owner at lists.okfn.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of openbiblio-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National     Bibliography
>      (Rufus Pollock)
>   2. Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National     Bibliography
>      (William Waites)
>   3. Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National     Bibliography
>      (William Waites)
>   4. Re: [open-bibliography] British Library data      announcement
>      (Deliot, Corine)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:34:14 +0000
> From: Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
> Subject: Re: [openbiblio-dev] [open-bibliography] ANN: British
>        National        Bibliography
> To: William Waites <ww-dated-1290871008.d81a18 at eris.okfn.org>
> Cc: openbiblio-dev at lists.okfn.org
> Message-ID:
>        <AANLkTi=_D5=09LE6taBcoWacBpUtGm0ZMM102d_pHRY0 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hi Will (completely changing cc),
>
> Great work on this :)
>
> One very minor request: as your post
> (<http://eris.okfn.org/ww/2010/11/bl>) is a) really useful and b) part
> of the JISC OpenBib work please could you also repost it on
> openbiblio.net (that's where it gets picked up by JISC from).
>
> Also suggestion for minor reformatting of record entries [1] (you've
> already done a great job here!):
>
> 1. Subject (e.g. 828.8) should be a hyperlink and other 'rdf' stuff in
> that field should be hidden
> 2. Authors should be a hyperlink and rdf stuff should be hidden
> 3. What is foaf:isPrimaryTopicCo and what do links mean?
>
> [1]:  e.g. <http://bnb.bibliographica.org/entry/GB5105728>
>
> Rufus
>
> On 22 November 2010 15:16, William Waites <ww at eris.okfn.org> wrote:
> > Following up on the earlier announcement [1] that the British Library
> > [2] has made the British National Bibliography [3] available under a
> > public domain dedication, the JISC Open Bibliography [4] project has
> > worked to make this data more useable.
> >
> > The data has been loaded into a Virtuoso store that is queriable
> > through the SPARQL Endpoint [5] and the URIs that we have assigned
> > each record use the ORDF [6] software to make them dereferencable,
> > supporting perform content auto-negotiation as well as embedding RDFa
> > in the HTML representation.
> >
> > The data contains some 3 million individual records and some 173
> > million triples. Indexing the data was a very CPU intensive process
> > taking approximately three days. Transforming and loading the source
> > data took about five hours.
> >
> > For more detail see http://eris.okfn.org/ww/2010/11/bl
> >
> > ? 1.
> http://openbiblio.net/2010/11/17/jisc-openbibliography-british-library-data-release/
> > ? 2. http://www.bl.uk/
> > ? 3. http://www.bl.uk/bibliographic/natbib.html
> > ? 4. http://openbiblio.net/
> > ? 5. http://bnb.bibliographica.org/sparql
> > ? 6. http://ordf.org/
> >
> > --
> > William Waites
> > http://eris.okfn.org/ww/foaf#i
> > 9C7E F636 52F6 1004 E40A ?E565 98E3 BBF3 8320 7664
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > open-bibliography mailing list
> > open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
> > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Co-Founder, Open Knowledge Foundation
> Promoting Open Knowledge in a Digital Age
> http://www.okfn.org/ - http://blog.okfn.org/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:29:49 +0100
> From: William Waites <ww at eris.okfn.org>
> Subject: Re: [openbiblio-dev] [open-bibliography] ANN: British
>        National        Bibliography
> To: Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
> Cc: openbiblio-dev at lists.okfn.org
> Message-ID: <20101122212949.GW60158 at styx.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> * [2010-11-22 20:34:14 +0000] Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
> ?crit:
>
> ] Hi Will (completely changing cc),
>
> Good idea :)
>
> ] Great work on this :)
>
> Thank you.
>
> ] One very minor request: as your post
> ] (<http://eris.okfn.org/ww/2010/11/bl>) is a) really useful and b) part
> ] of the JISC OpenBib work please could you also repost it on
> ] openbiblio.net (that's where it gets picked up by JISC from).
>
> Already did (with a "continue reading below the cut for the gory
> technical details)
>
> ] Also suggestion for minor reformatting of record entries [1] (you've
> ] already done a great job here!):
> ]
> ] 1. Subject (e.g. 828.8) should be a hyperlink and other 'rdf' stuff in
> ] that field should be hidden
>
> This is actually tricky because the formatting keys on rdf:type and
> these resources have no type. I can look at hiding anything skos
> related...
>
> ] 2. Authors should be a hyperlink and rdf stuff should be hidden
>
> There is a hyperlink at sameAs, the authors themselves are blank nodes
> and so cannot be linked to. This is to avoid changing the BL data so
> far as possible and so the N3/turtle representation looks nicer. Some
> of the clearly unwanted RDF stuff can be hidden in the same was as #1
> though.
>
> ] 3. What is foaf:isPrimaryTopicCo and what do links mean?
>
> A typeo -- see the Errata section in the post. It is supposed to be
> foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf. I'm of two minds whether this should be hidden
> (when corrected). On the one hand it can look like extra junk. On the
> other hand it gives a direct way to link to the various
> documents that represent the resource. Maybe something clever can be
> done with the CSS to move it elsewhere on the page...
>
> Cheers,
> -w
> --
> William Waites
> http://eris.okfn.org/ww/foaf#i
> 9C7E F636 52F6 1004 E40A  E565 98E3 BBF3 8320 7664
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:12:29 +0100
> From: William Waites <ww at eris.okfn.org>
> Subject: Re: [openbiblio-dev] [open-bibliography] ANN: British
>        National        Bibliography
> To: Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
> Cc: openbiblio-dev at lists.okfn.org
> Message-ID: <20101123101229.GA60158 at styx.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> * [2010-11-22 20:34:14 +0000] Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
> ?crit:
>
> ] 1. Subject (e.g. 828.8) should be a hyperlink and other 'rdf' stuff in
> ] that field should be hidden
> ] 2. Authors should be a hyperlink and rdf stuff should be hidden
>
> Actually it turns out this was already done, just that the new CSS had
> no .hidden class. You have to put the information there and hide it
> otherwise it gets lost when reading the RDFa. (I'm not a big fan of
> RDFa as opposed to transmitting the RDF separately, but it seems to be
> gaining momentum...)
>
> Cheers,
> -w
> --
> William Waites
> http://eris.okfn.org/ww/foaf#i
> 9C7E F636 52F6 1004 E40A  E565 98E3 BBF3 8320 7664
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:15:52 -0000
> From: "Deliot, Corine" <Corine.Deliot at bl.uk>
> Subject: Re: [openbiblio-dev] [open-bibliography] British Library data
>        announcement
> To: "List for Working Group on Open Bibliographic Data"
>        <open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org>, <mark at odaesa.com>
> Cc: openbiblio-dev at lists.okfn.org, metadata <metadata at bl.uk>
> Message-ID:
>        <19BB7EB59CBC594D8DD9F3ACA1EB24A201538D5C at w2k3-bspex2.ad.bl.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="utf-8"
>
> The British Library is not a member of OCLC and is therefore not
> restricted by any terms which may apply to its membership. The Library
> supplies records to a wide variety of union catalogues (e.g. SUNCAT &
> COPAC) in order to increase the global visibility of its collections.
> Contributing records to OCLC's WorldCat system is simply part of this
> wider strategy to improve awareness and usage of the BL's holdings.
>
> Corine
>
> *********************************
> Corine Deliot
> Metadata Standards Analyst
> The British Library
> Boston Spa, Wetherby
> West Yorkshire LS23 7BQ
> e-mail: corine.deliot at bl.uk
> *********************************
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: open-bibliography-bounces at lists.okfn.org
> [mailto:open-bibliography-bounces at lists.okfn.org] On Behalf Of Tim
> Spalding
> Sent: 2010-11-22 18:13
> To: mark at odaesa.com; List for Working Group on Open Bibliographic Data
> Cc: openbiblio-dev at lists.okfn.org
> Subject: Re: [open-bibliography] British Library data announcement
>
> Does anyone know what's up with BL adding 10 million records to OCLC?
> ( See
> http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/Digest/The-British-Library-Adds--Million
> -Records-to-WorldCat-71930.asp
> ). They seem to be going in two directions-toward open data and away
> from it.
>
> Does OCLC have any sort of special deal, or are they now subject to
> the clauses about not contributing to efforts that undermine OCLC?
>
> Tim
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-bibliography mailing list
> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
>
> **************************************************************************
> Experience the British Library online at http://www.bl.uk/
>
> The British Library?s new interactive Annual Report and Accounts 2009/10 :
> http://www.bl.uk/knowledge
>
> Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book.
> http://www.bl.uk/adoptabook
>
> The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled
>
> *************************************************************************
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the mailto:
> postmaster at bl.uk : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or
> copied without the sender's consent.
>
> The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the
> author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The
> British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the
> author.
>
> *************************************************************************
>  Think before you print
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> openbiblio-dev mailing list
> openbiblio-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/openbiblio-dev
>
>
> End of openbiblio-dev Digest, Vol 6, Issue 6
> ********************************************
>

-- 
*Jayadev Kumbar,
Librarian,*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/openbiblio-dev/attachments/20101123/36d967ea/attachment.html>