[openbiblio-dev] need help in intigrating the Active Directory
Ben O'Steen
bosteen at gmail.com
Tue Nov 23 12:38:16 UTC 2010
I think you are meaning the OpenBiblio software project
http://obiblio.sourceforge.net/?
The obiblio software has nothing to do with this Open Bibliography
project unfortunately, and a quick look at the site shows the latest
post occurring over a year ago.
I would suggest chasing up with the owners of the above site.
Ben
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:03 +0530, Jayadev Kumbar wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> I need to intigrate the Active Directory to Open Biblio. please help
> me in this regard
>
> thank you
> Jayadev
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:30 PM,
> <openbiblio-dev-request at lists.okfn.org> wrote:
> Send openbiblio-dev mailing list submissions to
> openbiblio-dev at lists.okfn.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/openbiblio-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> openbiblio-dev-request at lists.okfn.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> openbiblio-dev-owner at lists.okfn.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
> specific
> than "Re: Contents of openbiblio-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National
> Bibliography
> (Rufus Pollock)
> 2. Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National
> Bibliography
> (William Waites)
> 3. Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National
> Bibliography
> (William Waites)
> 4. Re: [open-bibliography] British Library data
> announcement
> (Deliot, Corine)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:34:14 +0000
> From: Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
> Subject: Re: [openbiblio-dev] [open-bibliography] ANN: British
> National Bibliography
> To: William Waites <ww-dated-1290871008.d81a18 at eris.okfn.org>
> Cc: openbiblio-dev at lists.okfn.org
> Message-ID:
>
> <AANLkTi=_D5=09LE6taBcoWacBpUtGm0ZMM102d_pHRY0 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hi Will (completely changing cc),
>
> Great work on this :)
>
> One very minor request: as your post
> (<http://eris.okfn.org/ww/2010/11/bl>) is a) really useful and
> b) part
> of the JISC OpenBib work please could you also repost it on
> openbiblio.net (that's where it gets picked up by JISC from).
>
> Also suggestion for minor reformatting of record entries [1]
> (you've
> already done a great job here!):
>
> 1. Subject (e.g. 828.8) should be a hyperlink and other 'rdf'
> stuff in
> that field should be hidden
> 2. Authors should be a hyperlink and rdf stuff should be
> hidden
> 3. What is foaf:isPrimaryTopicCo and what do links mean?
>
> [1]: e.g. <http://bnb.bibliographica.org/entry/GB5105728>
>
> Rufus
>
> On 22 November 2010 15:16, William Waites <ww at eris.okfn.org>
> wrote:
> > Following up on the earlier announcement [1] that the
> British Library
> > [2] has made the British National Bibliography [3] available
> under a
> > public domain dedication, the JISC Open Bibliography [4]
> project has
> > worked to make this data more useable.
> >
> > The data has been loaded into a Virtuoso store that is
> queriable
> > through the SPARQL Endpoint [5] and the URIs that we have
> assigned
> > each record use the ORDF [6] software to make them
> dereferencable,
> > supporting perform content auto-negotiation as well as
> embedding RDFa
> > in the HTML representation.
> >
> > The data contains some 3 million individual records and some
> 173
> > million triples. Indexing the data was a very CPU intensive
> process
> > taking approximately three days. Transforming and loading
> the source
> > data took about five hours.
> >
> > For more detail see http://eris.okfn.org/ww/2010/11/bl
> >
> > ? 1.
> http://openbiblio.net/2010/11/17/jisc-openbibliography-british-library-data-release/
> > ? 2. http://www.bl.uk/
> > ? 3. http://www.bl.uk/bibliographic/natbib.html
> > ? 4. http://openbiblio.net/
> > ? 5. http://bnb.bibliographica.org/sparql
> > ? 6. http://ordf.org/
> >
> > --
> > William Waites
> > http://eris.okfn.org/ww/foaf#i
> > 9C7E F636 52F6 1004 E40A ?E565 98E3 BBF3 8320 7664
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > open-bibliography mailing list
> > open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
> > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Co-Founder, Open Knowledge Foundation
> Promoting Open Knowledge in a Digital Age
> http://www.okfn.org/ - http://blog.okfn.org/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:29:49 +0100
> From: William Waites <ww at eris.okfn.org>
> Subject: Re: [openbiblio-dev] [open-bibliography] ANN: British
> National Bibliography
> To: Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
> Cc: openbiblio-dev at lists.okfn.org
> Message-ID: <20101122212949.GW60158 at styx.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> * [2010-11-22 20:34:14 +0000] Rufus Pollock
> <rufus.pollock at okfn.org> ?crit:
>
> ] Hi Will (completely changing cc),
>
> Good idea :)
>
> ] Great work on this :)
>
> Thank you.
>
> ] One very minor request: as your post
> ] (<http://eris.okfn.org/ww/2010/11/bl>) is a) really useful
> and b) part
> ] of the JISC OpenBib work please could you also repost it on
> ] openbiblio.net (that's where it gets picked up by JISC
> from).
>
> Already did (with a "continue reading below the cut for the
> gory
> technical details)
>
> ] Also suggestion for minor reformatting of record entries [1]
> (you've
> ] already done a great job here!):
> ]
> ] 1. Subject (e.g. 828.8) should be a hyperlink and other
> 'rdf' stuff in
> ] that field should be hidden
>
> This is actually tricky because the formatting keys on
> rdf:type and
> these resources have no type. I can look at hiding anything
> skos
> related...
>
> ] 2. Authors should be a hyperlink and rdf stuff should be
> hidden
>
> There is a hyperlink at sameAs, the authors themselves are
> blank nodes
> and so cannot be linked to. This is to avoid changing the BL
> data so
> far as possible and so the N3/turtle representation looks
> nicer. Some
> of the clearly unwanted RDF stuff can be hidden in the same
> was as #1
> though.
>
> ] 3. What is foaf:isPrimaryTopicCo and what do links mean?
>
> A typeo -- see the Errata section in the post. It is supposed
> to be
> foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf. I'm of two minds whether this should be
> hidden
> (when corrected). On the one hand it can look like extra junk.
> On the
> other hand it gives a direct way to link to the various
> documents that represent the resource. Maybe something clever
> can be
> done with the CSS to move it elsewhere on the page...
>
> Cheers,
> -w
> --
> William Waites
> http://eris.okfn.org/ww/foaf#i
> 9C7E F636 52F6 1004 E40A E565 98E3 BBF3 8320 7664
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:12:29 +0100
> From: William Waites <ww at eris.okfn.org>
> Subject: Re: [openbiblio-dev] [open-bibliography] ANN: British
> National Bibliography
> To: Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
> Cc: openbiblio-dev at lists.okfn.org
> Message-ID: <20101123101229.GA60158 at styx.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> * [2010-11-22 20:34:14 +0000] Rufus Pollock
> <rufus.pollock at okfn.org> ?crit:
>
> ] 1. Subject (e.g. 828.8) should be a hyperlink and other
> 'rdf' stuff in
> ] that field should be hidden
> ] 2. Authors should be a hyperlink and rdf stuff should be
> hidden
>
> Actually it turns out this was already done, just that the new
> CSS had
> no .hidden class. You have to put the information there and
> hide it
> otherwise it gets lost when reading the RDFa. (I'm not a big
> fan of
> RDFa as opposed to transmitting the RDF separately, but it
> seems to be
> gaining momentum...)
>
> Cheers,
> -w
> --
> William Waites
> http://eris.okfn.org/ww/foaf#i
> 9C7E F636 52F6 1004 E40A E565 98E3 BBF3 8320 7664
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:15:52 -0000
> From: "Deliot, Corine" <Corine.Deliot at bl.uk>
> Subject: Re: [openbiblio-dev] [open-bibliography] British
> Library data
> announcement
> To: "List for Working Group on Open Bibliographic Data"
> <open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org>, <mark at odaesa.com>
> Cc: openbiblio-dev at lists.okfn.org, metadata <metadata at bl.uk>
> Message-ID:
>
> <19BB7EB59CBC594D8DD9F3ACA1EB24A201538D5C at w2k3-bspex2.ad.bl.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> The British Library is not a member of OCLC and is therefore
> not
> restricted by any terms which may apply to its membership. The
> Library
> supplies records to a wide variety of union catalogues (e.g.
> SUNCAT &
> COPAC) in order to increase the global visibility of its
> collections.
> Contributing records to OCLC's WorldCat system is simply part
> of this
> wider strategy to improve awareness and usage of the BL's
> holdings.
>
> Corine
>
> *********************************
> Corine Deliot
> Metadata Standards Analyst
> The British Library
> Boston Spa, Wetherby
> West Yorkshire LS23 7BQ
> e-mail: corine.deliot at bl.uk
> *********************************
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: open-bibliography-bounces at lists.okfn.org
> [mailto:open-bibliography-bounces at lists.okfn.org] On Behalf Of
> Tim
> Spalding
> Sent: 2010-11-22 18:13
> To: mark at odaesa.com; List for Working Group on Open
> Bibliographic Data
> Cc: openbiblio-dev at lists.okfn.org
> Subject: Re: [open-bibliography] British Library data
> announcement
>
> Does anyone know what's up with BL adding 10 million records
> to OCLC?
> ( See
> http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/Digest/The-British-Library-Adds--Million
> -Records-to-WorldCat-71930.asp
> ). They seem to be going in two directions-toward open data
> and away
> from it.
>
> Does OCLC have any sort of special deal, or are they now
> subject to
> the clauses about not contributing to efforts that undermine
> OCLC?
>
> Tim
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-bibliography mailing list
> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
>
> **************************************************************************
> Experience the British Library online at http://www.bl.uk/
>
> The British Library?s new interactive Annual Report and
> Accounts 2009/10 : http://www.bl.uk/knowledge
>
> Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt
> a Book. http://www.bl.uk/adoptabook
>
> The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled
>
> *************************************************************************
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and
> may be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s)
> only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete
> this e-mail and notify the mailto:postmaster at bl.uk : The
> contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied
> without the sender's consent.
>
> The statements and opinions expressed in this message are
> those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of
> the British Library. The British Library does not take any
> responsibility for the views of the author.
>
> *************************************************************************
> Think before you print
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> openbiblio-dev mailing list
> openbiblio-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/openbiblio-dev
>
>
> End of openbiblio-dev Digest, Vol 6, Issue 6
> ********************************************
>
>
>
> --
> Jayadev Kumbar,
> Librarian,
>
> _______________________________________________
> openbiblio-dev mailing list
> openbiblio-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/openbiblio-dev
More information about the openbiblio-dev
mailing list