[openbiblio-dev] BibJSON vs RDF

[William Waites]

On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 23:36:35 +0000, Mark MacGillivray <mark at odaesa.com> said:

    > Presumably the useful example intended was that by putting stuff
    > in JSON we can really easily do the things like build search /
    > facet / graph UIs on the web. Of course, we could do RDF in JSON
    > too, so it is definitely not a replacement for RDF. BibJSON is
    > just the convention of representing bibliographic metadata in
    > JSON, which is useful.

There was even some idea back at the beginning of trying to have
BibJSON be compatible with JSON-LD. Now that JSON-LD seems to have
stabilised a bit, and BibJSON has evolved a bit, does this bear
revisiting?

Cheers,
-w
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/openbiblio-dev/attachments/20120208/e8f2345a/attachment.sig>