[pdb-discuss] Re: Writing a grant proposal for the public domain works db
Timothy Cowlishaw
timcowlishaw at gmail.com
Thu Jun 8 20:36:58 UTC 2006
Hi all,
Just finishing it up now.
Will get it posted up to the list for ritual dissection later this
evening...
cheers,
Tim
On 8 Jun 2006, at 20:51, Rufus Pollock wrote:
> Dear Tim,
>
> Just wondered what's happening on this ...
>
> ~rufus
>
> Tim Cowlishaw wrote:
>> Just a quick update.... I have a few hundred introductory words
>> written... need to tidy up the text and find a couple of
>> citations, then i'll post it up to the wiki, or to this list. I'll
>> also have a crack at outlining the technical details and
>> architecture of the project, but this may need wholesale
>> correction / adjustment / clarification by someone actually
>> involved in the development process. I'll aim to get a first
>> draft done tonight.....
>> On 5/26/06, *Rufus Pollock* <rufus.pollock at okfn.org
>> <mailto:rufus.pollock at okfn.org>> wrote:
>> Tim Cowlishaw wrote:
>> [snip]
>> >
>> > PS: we should produce this first version as a plain
>> text (we
>> can convert
>> > to something glossy pdf/word ... later if necessary)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > page on the wiki perhaps?
>> yes though i often find email easier at the 'alpha' stage --
>> so either
>> post to the list or post to the wiki and then notify the list
>> > Also, I've been looking at the AHRC website... waht
>> category does
>> this
>> > research fall under. AS it isn't a Doctoral / MRes project for
>> anyone,
>> > I'm assuming it comes under 'Knowledge Transfer Schemes' -
>> > http://www.ahrb.ac.uk/about/ke/knowledge/
>> knowledge_activities.asp
>> >
>> > Is this correct? It'd be good to be able to find out what
>> specific
>> > information they're after. would they want a budget, or
>> atleast a
>> rough
>> > suggestion of numbers? otherwise, I''m assuming that I'm
>> essentially
>> > writing an academic paper on the benefits of the pdb
>> project. Is
>> this
>> > the case?
>> For the first version I wouldn't worry too much about the AHRC
>> angle but
>> instead focus on a simple two pager that we can send to Vera.
>> We can
>> always extend and beef this up later as needed. In particular
>> we do
>> *not* need a budget in this first version just an overview of
>> the issue
>> and what we propose to build (i.e. a prototype web application
>> and db).
>> Regards,
>> Rufus
More information about the pd-discuss
mailing list