[pd-discuss] Flowchart based Public Domain calculator API call

[Maarten Zeinstra]

A backing database would be a good idea, it could certainly help in accuracy.

Today I am trying to encode the Dutch flowchart to XML, and I found an exception that does not fit our static encoding of document types.
In the documentation we now have these types for a given work: 

	LITERARY = "text"
	SOUND = "recording"
	PHOTO = "photograph"
	VIDEO = "video"
	DATABASE = "database"

The dutch, as do many jurisdiction(?), state that laws and decrees are a special type, immediately falling in the public domain. Should we add a type
LEGAL = "legal" to differentiate this type?

Kind regards,

Maarten Zeinstra

Kennisland | Knowledgeland 
T: +31.20.575.6720 | E: mz at kl.nl
www.kennisland.nl | www.knowledgeland.org

On Feb 13, 2010, at 24:10 , Rufus Pollock wrote:

> Wow Maarten, great work! Comments inline below.
> 
> On 11 February 2010 08:53, Maarten Zeinstra <mz at kl.nl> wrote:
>> HI all,
>> I am happy to announce that a preliminary version of the flowchart based
>> automatic public domain calculator can be tested (a bit) on
>> test.kl.nl/API/?json=
> 
> Great stuff. I've now deployed the results of our coding efforts in
> Luxembourg onto publicdomainworks.net:
> 
> <http://www.publicdomainworks.net/api/>
> 
> As yet I haven't connected this into our actual calculators [1] but
> that is next on the agenda.
> 
> [1]:<http://knowledgeforge.net/pdw/hg/file/tip/pdw/pd/>
> 
> [...]
> 
>> This will be communicated using json, a json structure would look like:
> 
> [...] - I've snipped the json because it was rendering poorly in my
> email client (all flattened) but this is really nice. Would you be
> able to update the wiki page documenting/speccing the API with this
> info?
> 
> I also think one thing that would be really nice (but it obviously
> requires a backing db such as PD works) is for the API to be able to
> do a bit of work such as determining author death date just from
> author name (i.e. for the API to match an author name against a
> relevant author object). My guess is that most human users of a
> calculators won't always know all relevant information.
> 
>> Which will perform the calculation. Now it will state 'Uncertain, lacking
>> information' this is because is now standardly based on Generic European
>> flowcharts and hits a wall at the "Is at least one of the authors of the
>> jurisdiction"
> 
> This might be where the uncertainty field comes in. It would be nice
> to give an approximate answer in cases where you have 95% of the
> relevant info (and the author jurisdiction item is very minor ...)
> 
>> The programming is now in a test phase but I could really use some help
>> transforming flowcharts into XML structures
>> If anyone wants to help this cause please contact me! :)
> 
> I'm happy to help though you know my preference for code over XML ;)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rufus

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/pd-discuss/attachments/20100215/3c23a681/attachment.html>