[wsfii-discuss] WSFII.org website in pity full state!

Sun Jun 17 06:02:54 UTC 2007

WSFII is surviving only because of its self organizing nature.  Just reflect
do all of us know the initial singatories to WSFII ? . I don't see them
around but WSFII is still around.

   The WSFII ship needs some anchor when it prepares for the next sail -
Ghana/ Catalonia ? till then  these Anchor will not let WSFII drift . Anchor
does not decides the direction but the people on board

Klavs & Klochi  have been the earliest anchors who silently worked for all
of us.
But WSFII has grown bigger & needs more time than their leisurely hours
permit.  Many have shown willingness to contribute their time.  We just need
more people to make sure work gets executed.

We need facilitators only to make it convenient point to contribute to WSFII
.

vickram gave a nice example on the Dharamshala event . Many international
participants could not reach becasue they were not guided on the travel
documentation well in advance.

Thus I reiterate WSFII needs anchor for some important activities.  Website
& Event coordination strike an immediate priority .

regards

Ashish

On 6/14/07, Fred Pook <fredpook at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Cheers Gerard!
> Totally agree with you, and yes I will also take a beer ...
> maybe self-reflection and communication is all that is needed in our
> open-source way of working and if that can get some more speed by an
> enlightened lead taking person.. hmm
> Greets Fred
>
>
> On 6/13/07, Gerard Mourits <gerard at mourits.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:44:54 -0400, "Ian Howard"
> > <ihoward at netdotworking.com> said:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Not to be a thorn, but I would encourage us not to lose site of the
> > > original ideals of WSFII, that is an open, collaborative and
> > > self-organizing endeavour, modelled around open source. In that light,
> I
> > > would suggest that we not appoint someone to be in charge, but that we
> > > encourage some individuals to focus their contributions on particular
> > > aspects of this effort. If anything we should certainly focus on
> making
> > > sure that we really encourage some local on the ground people to do
> > > participate more. Leaders in open source pull things together and
> > > encourage participation of others.
> > >
> > Nice words but are they really of this world?
> > I think Fred meant by his 'putting in charge' that if work is to be done
> > somebody has to take the lead.
> > If nobody takes the lead and there is nobody 'in charge' then where are
> > we going to.
> > This don't mean that we need a kind of Hitler to marched in front of the
> > troops.
> > We would certainly let this happen at all. Bu we need en lighted people
> > that shows us the road ahead.
> > 'Self-organizing endeavour' come out of books and with books we describe
> > thing that passed.
> >
> > > So, to answer Tomas' questions:
> > >
> > > So who take the lead?  No one, this is a self-organizing effort
> > And out of this self-organizing effort comes what ? a leader?
> >
> > > When do we organize?  again, self-organize
> > And what happens if we got two self-organizing mechanisms?
> >
> > > When the first meeting to assess situation, offers and plan?  there
> > > should be an effort to encourage contributions and a wide call for
> input
> > > and distributed decision making.
> > At first we need a direction: where are we going ?
> >
> > >
> > > Anyone who knows me will know that this self-organizing arrangement is
> > > not one that came naturally for this ex-soldier, though, I believe in
> > > open source and I believe that if we buy-in to the process of
> > > self-organization and that we work to optimize collaboration that this
> > > will be something fruitful. Not only will we pull off a meeting, but
> we
> > > will pull off another self-organizing event.
> > The problem is with self-organizing communities that there has to be
> > someone to point out to this direction (and take the lead).
> > It is not "if this" or "if that". It is "and this" "and that" and work
> > together on multiple levels.
> > http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/714
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Cheers!
> > Cheers to you! I'll now take a beer.
> >
> > Gerard
> > >
> > > Ian
> > >
> > >
> > > Fred Pook wrote:
> > > > Hiya,
> > > > I am happy this thread is picking up and we are chatting..
> > > > IMHO I would put Ashish in charge of this effort of making the WSFII
> > > > online presence a solid one.
> > > > Please reply if there are objections to this
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Fred
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 6/5/07, Thomas Maketa <tmaketa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> So who take the lead ?
> > > >> When do we organize?
> > > >> When the first meeting to assess situation, offers and plan?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 6/5/07, Rob Dyke < rob at comwifinet.com> wrote:
> > > >> > Ashish, All,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Here is my offer of contributing time and effort for the critical
> > > >> > infrastructure side of things. I've much kit and much caboodle,
> *some*
> > > >> > time... All donated towards WSFII.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Looks like there are a couple of things immediately arising from
> this
> > > >> > thread....
> > > >> > * Web presence overhaul - tool and template
> > > >> > * Import of OKFN hosted info
> > > >> > * Support for translations
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I'm lurking with Saul in IRC.... let's continue this thread and
> > > >> chatter
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Rob
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Saul Albert wrote:
> > > >> > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:39:15AM +0530, Assoc of Public ICT
> Tools
> > > >> Access Prov wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >>    Henceforth can we think of building a team of say 3 people
> > > >> for the
> > > >> > >>    critical infrastructure ?  like the web site  & events.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I'm afraid I can't help out with infrastructure... but as I
> said,
> > > >> I'd
> > > >> > > be *really* happy to contribute reports and updates from
> London...
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I'd like to remind you all about the wsfii irc channel which
> has
> > > >> been
> > > >> > > dead for a while - but could help if people are feeling
> isolated
> > > >> in the
> > > >> > > way they're working ;)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > irc://irc.oftc.net#wsfii
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > See you there maybe?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I'll be idling there this morning, but I read scrollback :)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > X
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Saul.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > _______________________________________________
> > > >> > wsfii-discuss mailing list
> > > >> > wsfii-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> > > >> > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/wsfii-discuss
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> wsfii-discuss mailing list
> > > >> wsfii-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> > > >> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/wsfii-discuss
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > wsfii-discuss mailing list
> > > > wsfii-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> > > > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/wsfii-discuss
> > > >
> > > > !DSPAM:1,4665c65f29641717162815!
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > wsfii-discuss mailing list
> > > wsfii-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> > > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/wsfii-discuss
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wsfii-discuss mailing list
> > wsfii-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/wsfii-discuss
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> wsfii-discuss mailing list
> wsfii-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/wsfii-discuss
>

-- 
Association of Public ICT Tools Access Provider
http://www.apiap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/wsfii-discuss/attachments/20070617/cbd67600/attachment-0002.html>