[ckan-dev] routing bugs
David Read
david.read at okfn.org
Wed Apr 27 13:49:40 UTC 2011
On 27 April 2011 15:24, David Raznick <kindly at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:07 PM, David Read <david.read at okfn.org> wrote:
>>
>> I've fixed the minor tests left broken in branch
>> defect-1106-bugs-with-routing.
>>
>> I'm not clear why Rufus branched for 1.3.4.1 when we're still in beta
>> for 1.3.4. Also, it seems wrong to include a week of new features in
>> 1.3.4.1 that aren't in 1.3.4 (such as the new authz pages). It would
>> have been more sensible to branch from 1.3.4. And call it a beta. Does
>> anyone mind if I scrap this 1.3.4.1 curiosity and just roll it into
>> 1.3.4? Or are we desperate to have the new features put into beta?
>>
> James is using 1.3.4 branch for the UAT testing for DGU. That is why the
> extra branch was made as we did not want to change what James had already
> packaged. The bugs we found are not as relevant for DGU.
Ah, I understand now.
> In future I think that the branches for dgu testing should be separated from
> ckan release branches to stop this from happening again.
> I agree it would have been more sensible to branch from 1.3.4 but the damage
> is done now. Also 1.3.5b could be a better name for it and I am happy for it
> to be called that.
That sounds like the easiest option and pleases everyone. I'll do that now.
D
> Thanks
> David
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
>
>
More information about the ckan-dev
mailing list