[ckan-dev] Difference in total number of registered packages

[Jan Kučera]

David,

Thank you very much. Your explanation is enough.

Jan Kucera



> Jan,
>
> The difference in package numbers is no doubt due to 7 packages having
> being deleted. Because the database is revisioned, they still exist,
> so that they could be reinstated if necessary. Unfortunately in this
> version of CKAN (1.3.1a) the number on the front-page includes the
> deleted packages. The deleting feature had not been used much until
> the past few months so the discrepancy was not too important.
>
> You/we could upgrade the version, if necessary, although perhaps this
> explanation is enough for now.
>
> David
>
> On 16 May 2011 18:43, Jan Kučera <elquenor at gmail.com <http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev>> wrote:
> >* Hello,*> >**> >* I'm working with Czech instance of CKAN at cz.ckan.net. I would like to ask*> >* you how the total number of packages is counted in CKAN. Czech instance of*> >* CKAN currently shows two different numbers of registered packages.*> >**> >* Homepage (http://cz.ckan.net/) shows 154 registered packages but page named*> >* Data Packages (http://cz.ckan.net/package/) shows only 147 registered*> >* packages. When I use CKAN API it lists 147 packages.*> >**> >* Do you have any idea how to determine which number is correct? And do you*> >* have any clue what might cause the difference?*> >**> >* Thank you*> >**> >* Jan Kucera*> >**> >* _______________________________________________*> >* ckan-dev mailing list*> >* ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org <http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev>*> >* http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev*> >**> >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ckan-dev/attachments/20110516/148e5642/attachment-0001.html>