[ckan-dev] Docker

[Adrià Mercader]

I think a basic docker image included with the main repo is definetely
the way to go, and then if people need more advanced setups they can
move to other options.

>From what I understood the only thing that needs to be fixed on the
existing images is the link to schema.xml in the Solr image. Is there
are another reason for replacing it entirely with a new one?

On 8 October 2015 at 00:21, Steven De Costa
<steven.decosta at linkdigital.com.au> wrote:
> Neat, thanks everyone for being so helpful here :)
>
> I launched a generic CKAN at www.ckanau.org last week which is based on the
> AWS marketplace build.
>
> One of the things I'm keen to consider for CKAN is more tools for
> integration. You might consider these as extensions integrated with a more
> developed interface for platform configuration.
>
> I hope to attract technology partners like Docker to directly support some
> of the use cases that are discussed here in the CKAN dev list. As such, it
> would be good to also seed this discussion on https://forums.docker.com/.
>
> I've got a few contacts into the Docker team now and aim to grow these out
> and align things for both projects along our development roadmap.
>
> Hoots!
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 6, 2015, Serban Teodorescu <teodorescu.serban at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I am part of the HDX team.
>>
>> HDX platform uses an internally modified ckan and we migrated to docker
>> for more than 6 months.
>>
>> If anyone is interested, please reply to this message and I will try to
>> make a simple docker configuration using only docker and docker-compose.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Serban Teodorescu.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/ckan-dev
>