[ckan-discuss] Options to store cleaned-up data

Sun Oct 31 23:08:42 GMT 2010

On 31 October 2010 23:01, Brand Niemann <bniemann at cox.net> wrote:
> I have focused on working with a number of US government data spreadsheets
> with high quality that are updated regularly and would not suggest using
> blobs of data as alternatives since one looses the ability to do
> analytics/statistics on those data.

Quite agree Brand, but I'm not sure Tim meant pure 'blobs' (i.e.
opaque binary objects). I took hime to mean he wanted to dump his copy
of the data (probably in structured form) somewhere else -- be that an
upload of a spreadsheet to google docs, or storing a structured dump
(json/csv/rdf) somewhere (e.g. archive.org/storage.ckan.net/s3 ...)

@Tim: is this understanding correct?

Rufus

> See http://semanticommunity.net/
>
> Brand Niemann US EPA
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tim McNamara
> To: CKAN discuss
> Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 5:27 PM
> Subject: [ckan-discuss] Options to store cleaned-up data
> I've been working with a few government spreadsheets. Their quality is
> ...variable. I've spent some time cleaning things up, however departments
> seem to be very reluctant to updating their records with something infected
> from the outside world. Do you think that there is any scope for CKAN to
> hold blobs of data as alternative sources?
> -Tim
>
> ________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-discuss mailing list
> ckan-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-discuss mailing list
> ckan-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-discuss
>
>

-- 
Co-Founder, Open Knowledge Foundation
Promoting Open Knowledge in a Digital Age
http://www.okfn.org/ - http://blog.okfn.org/